I am running a panel regression with the following problem:
In the first regression X has a significant impact on Y.
Then I introduce the interaction term XZ to test for a moderation. X becomes insignificant in this case despite XZ being insignificant.
How do I interpret this? It might be obvious but I dont really get it. How does the interaction term cause X to become insignificant despite XZ being insignificant itself?
Related Posts with Interpretation of significances with moderation effect
cmp for a tobit model with a binary endogenous variable?Dear Stata listers, I am estimating a model with a dependent truncated variable (i.e. an index betw…
repeatedly getting error when trying to create a panel "repeated time values within panel r(451)"I have the following data type. I have four countries with 50 companies each for three years. I was …
loop for scatter plotsHi everyone, i have 1 dependent variable and 20 independent variables and i would like to plot scatt…
"assert inrange(var1,1,5)" and "assert inrange(var1,1,5)&!missing(var1)"What's the difference between "assert inrange(var1,1,5)" and "assert inrange(var1,1,5)&!missing(…
Make panel dataHello Statalist! I want to make panel data from this: ID roa2009 roa2010 roa2011 roa2012 bis2009 …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpretation of significances with moderation effect
Post a Comment