Today when I read the esttab command of Stata (http://repec.org/bocode/e/estout/hlp_esttab.html), I saw the star options
Array
I know how to convert it to * for p<0.1, ** for p<0.05, *** for p<0.01 (the commonly-used p-value to set the levels of significance). But I am wondering why Stata set the default like that, is there anything important that I missed?
Related Posts with Curiousity about the default symbols of Stata?
parsing with variant length strings; overcoming ustrregexra greedinessI'm currently trying to parse text from string variables like this: Code: * Example generated by …
LSDV, problem with dummy variables and significanceHello, my data: panel data, 260 observations; 20 Regions and time period: 2004 to 2016. I have fou…
Storing results with a large loop (>11000)I am trying to store results across a large loop. I have previously done as follows but am limited t…
How to avoid losing variable labels when using collapse commandI have smallholder agriculture plot level commercialization data which i want to collapse to househo…
Collapse (mean) and data orderingHi statalist, I'm working with a data set that resembles the following: ID Income 1 50 1 40 1 20 2…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Curiousity about the default symbols of Stata?
Post a Comment