I notice that when I use the package rdrobust, I can easily replicate the resulting point estimate by using a local linear regression with the given bandwidth. Moreover, with robust standard errors in rdrobust and robust standard errors in the local linear regression, I get the same standard errors. However, when I cluster, the standard errors from the two methods are very different. Is this a bug? Or is there econometric reasoning why this would be the case?
If an example is required, I'd be happy to share mine, although I expect that this is a general result.
Related Posts with Strange Clustering Results from rdrobust
Using strings in a Stata dataset as filenamesI have a dataset with 1 column. This one column contains file names with their proper directory pref…
Changing dates from "dd/mm/yyyy 00:00" to "yyyy mm"Dear all, I am working with a large dataset of nearly 3 million observations on house prices in the…
Interpretation of interaction terms in OLSDear StataList Members, I am trying to estimate the household composition for female children in th…
reghdfe makes Mata forget Mata functionsHi, I am a beginner with Mata and also have not written Stata programs (.ado files). Inside a large…
A problem for conducting network meta regression by STATAI'm conducting a network meta regression with package mvmeta, howwever, "too many variables sepcific…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Strange Clustering Results from rdrobust
Post a Comment