I notice that when I use the package rdrobust, I can easily replicate the resulting point estimate by using a local linear regression with the given bandwidth. Moreover, with robust standard errors in rdrobust and robust standard errors in the local linear regression, I get the same standard errors. However, when I cluster, the standard errors from the two methods are very different. Is this a bug? Or is there econometric reasoning why this would be the case?
If an example is required, I'd be happy to share mine, although I expect that this is a general result.
Related Posts with Strange Clustering Results from rdrobust
how to merge data using different key variable names?I want to merge data between variable1 in dataset1 and variable2, variable3, variable4 in dataset2 r…
How to know whether laws affect dependent variables and paralell trend being satisfied following Chaisemartin and D'Haultfoeuille ?I am using a package called Code: did_multiplegt to run following Chaisemartin and D'Haultfoeuille …
How to know whether the paralell trend assumption is satisfied by using the method of Borusyak, (2021) in DiD ?Hi all, I am following the method of Borusyak, (2021) by running the Code: did_imputation package. …
How to do pca for a group of variables?From my understanding, pca is a method to suppress a couple of variables to one variable standing fo…
High R-square in ppmlDear Statalist community, I would like to clarify few things about using ppml on gravity data. 1. …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Strange Clustering Results from rdrobust
Post a Comment