I notice that when I use the package rdrobust, I can easily replicate the resulting point estimate by using a local linear regression with the given bandwidth. Moreover, with robust standard errors in rdrobust and robust standard errors in the local linear regression, I get the same standard errors. However, when I cluster, the standard errors from the two methods are very different. Is this a bug? Or is there econometric reasoning why this would be the case?
If an example is required, I'd be happy to share mine, although I expect that this is a general result.
Related Posts with Strange Clustering Results from rdrobust
Generalized difference in differences with panel dataHi, I am relatively new to Stata so any help would be greatly appreciated! Q: How do I do a general…
Error in cmp: "discontinuous region encountered cannot compute an improvement"Hi all, I am trying to run a cmp model between three binary variables: new_bf23, new_bf3 and z, whe…
How to plot the probability density function of multiple sets of data?How to plot the probability density function of multiple sets of data? Thanks. …
How to plot the probability density function of multiple sets of data?How to plot the probability density function of multiple sets of data? …
Logit, Probit and Penalised Maximum Likelihood (PMLE)Hi all, Just wondering as to why the sample sizes are different when I run Logit/probit and PMLE re…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Strange Clustering Results from rdrobust
Post a Comment