I notice that when I use the package rdrobust, I can easily replicate the resulting point estimate by using a local linear regression with the given bandwidth. Moreover, with robust standard errors in rdrobust and robust standard errors in the local linear regression, I get the same standard errors. However, when I cluster, the standard errors from the two methods are very different. Is this a bug? Or is there econometric reasoning why this would be the case?
If an example is required, I'd be happy to share mine, although I expect that this is a general result.
Related Posts with Strange Clustering Results from rdrobust
mean of frequency of each valueI have a variable which is ID with 26000 observations, there are more than 2000 values, some are rep…
combomarginsplot and file#opts question about text over just one graphGreetings, I am not yet able to provide a dataex sample that runs what I'm doing (sorry - my ineffic…
How to import JSON into StataHi, I am using Stata 17 and would need some help in importing JSON into Stata. This is my first tim…
Merging panel data filesHi all, I'm using Stata 13 I have two panel datasets which I want to combine before performing panel…
Counting amount of times a specific value occurs in a variableHi, I am trying to calculate the number of times a specific value (in this case a string) occurs in …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Strange Clustering Results from rdrobust
Post a Comment