I notice that when I use the package rdrobust, I can easily replicate the resulting point estimate by using a local linear regression with the given bandwidth. Moreover, with robust standard errors in rdrobust and robust standard errors in the local linear regression, I get the same standard errors. However, when I cluster, the standard errors from the two methods are very different. Is this a bug? Or is there econometric reasoning why this would be the case?
If an example is required, I'd be happy to share mine, although I expect that this is a general result.
Related Posts with Strange Clustering Result from rdrobust
How to run the seemingly unrelated regression? and how to compare the coefficients?Hello, suppose I have two regression using panel data random effect and cluster the error term Model…
Lagged variable that covers a range of time?Hello: I am a new user and I am wondering if there a way in Stata to create a lagged variable that …
Maximum size to import xlsx files into StataDear Forum Members, I wish to import a Excel file (around 100 mb). But Stata replied "The maximum …
create new categorical variable with different cutoffs depedent on condition (sex)Dear forum, I have a dataset of 407 participants, i am trying to categorise them by their hip to wa…
Insufficient observations errorHello! I am trying to use ARIMA models with 616 observations. However, the output kept indicating t…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Strange Clustering Result from rdrobust
Post a Comment