I notice that when I use the package rdrobust, I can easily replicate the resulting point estimate by using a local linear regression with the given bandwidth. Moreover, with robust standard errors in rdrobust and robust standard errors in the local linear regression, I get the same standard errors. However, when I cluster, the standard errors from the two methods are very different. Is this a bug? Or is there econometric reasoning why this would be the case?
If an example is required, I'd be happy to share mine, although I expect that this is a general result.
Related Posts with Strange Clustering Result from rdrobust
Help with nonstationarity and Cointegration (Phillips-Perron and Pedroni)Dear All, I am looking for some help as I am quite new to this. Any help or advice would be greatly…
Is there any way to absorb time dummies in xtreg, fe?Hello I want to do code : xtreg depvar indepvar i.day, fe vce (r) with the panel data. (day is a …
Looping using forvalue in winsor2I am using the following command in Stata 14.2 which has data stacked by industry-year wise. There a…
Full calculation of R^2 when using ivreghdfe and reghdfeIn ivreghdfe and reghdfe, although it's fast to just absorb fixed effects, if I add them into absorb…
Export to single Excel file with multiple sheets (based on variables) Code: +------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Strange Clustering Result from rdrobust
Post a Comment