I notice that when I use the package rdrobust, I can easily replicate the resulting point estimate by using a local linear regression with the given bandwidth. Moreover, with robust standard errors in rdrobust and robust standard errors in the local linear regression, I get the same standard errors. However, when I cluster, the standard errors from the two methods are very different. Is this a bug? Or is there econometric reasoning why this would be the case?
If an example is required, I'd be happy to share mine, although I expect that this is a general result.
Related Posts with Strange Clustering Result from rdrobust
Looking for methological adviceHi everyone, I'm looking for methodological advice on the undertaking described below. I tried to s…
convert northing and easting to longtitude and latitudeHi, is there a code for converting "northing" and "easting" to longitude and latitude? Many thanks! …
Two Step Binary Choice Regression Model: What type of regression model to use to avoid sample selection bias and autocorrelation?Hi, I have a two step-model (see below) in which all the people answer the question in the first par…
Drop observation if missing in two discontinous yearsHello, I have a lot of balance sheet data (with a lot of variables). What I need is for every idnr …
Regression Discontinuity - RDDensity test (Cattaneo)Hello everyone, This is my first time using Statalist as well as first time trying to do anything w…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Strange Clustering Result from rdrobust
Post a Comment