Hi all,
I am running the following regression using reghdfe written by @Sergio Correia:
reghdfe f.Dependent U c.U#c.Q Q $xlist i.year, absorb(firmcode) vce(cluster firmcode year)
where the dependent variable is the firm’s debt ratio and U and Q are my variables of interest and are constant for all firms in a year, and as you know, c.U#c.Q is the interaction between U and Q. I have 20 years of unbalanced data for 5123 firms.
When I run my regression, one-third of the year dummies (the latest years) will be omitted because of collinearity; they will be only omitted when I add U, Q or their interaction.
Would this assumption be correct that because I put the i.year at the end after all other variables, Stata will automatically only absorb the part of the year fixed effect that has not been already absorbed by the U or Q variables (or the other annual macro variables like GDP)? Or would U and Q be fully absorbed by the year fixed effect?
I appreciate your help.
Thank you.
Mona
Related Posts with Would constant annual variables across firms in a year be fully absorbed by the year dummy?
cleaning the dataset for diff and diff modelHi, I have the following unbalanced data. I want to clean my data to apply simple diff-in-diff model…
Clustering SEs in Panel IVFE regression eliminates significanceHello, I am studying country structural transformation by regressing log(manufacturing value added …
Measuring dynamicsHello, I'm doing a relatively simple analysis for a large group of banks for years 2011-2020. In pa…
Replacing missing values by matching them with a different observationDear all, this is my first post and I have recently been using STATA for operations beyond the basi…
Filtering in StataI have been trying to look for Stata equivalent of this SPSS filter creation " USE ALL. COMPUTE filt…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Would constant annual variables across firms in a year be fully absorbed by the year dummy?
Post a Comment