Hello everyone,
I am working on a binary panel data regression.
I did the Hausman test to see if I should use fixed effects or random effects for a logit regression. The test is telling me that the correct one to use is the fixed effects, however when I run the model, i get this result:
2136 groups (6408 obs = 3/4 of the individuals) dropped because of all positive or all negative outcomes and also 3 important variables are omitted because they have no within-group variance, the sex of the individual and the fathers and mothers education.
These variables don't change through the years for any individual and this is why its happening, they don't have within-group variance.
My question is if this problem is enough reason to ignore the Hausman test, change the model and run one with random effects or maybe there is some other test that i could do.
Also notice that with the random effects all these variables are significant.
Thank you so much in advance.
Related Posts with Help choosing Fixed effect vs Random effect for a binary panel data regression
Two way histogramArray Hi, I am relatively new to Stata and am trying to plot a two-way histogram to compare educatio…
Spatial Panel Data - matsize Hello everyone. hope you are fine and safe. I have Data for 134 countries from 2004 to 2018. When I…
quantile regression with fixed effects in a panel with T=2Hello Statalist, please I would like to ask for help. I am trying to run quantile regression in my i…
Change in probablity of being downgraded as the explanatory variable change from the bottom (30%) to the top (30%) of the sampleDear all, I am sorry to bother you. I was wondering how one could calculate the change in probablit…
Interpretation of clogithet regression (discrete choice experiment)Hi all, For my masterhtesis I've performed a discrete choice experiment. Currently I'm running diff…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Help choosing Fixed effect vs Random effect for a binary panel data regression
Post a Comment