Hello everyone,
I am working on a binary panel data regression.
I did the Hausman test to see if I should use fixed effects or random effects for a logit regression. The test is telling me that the correct one to use is the fixed effects, however when I run the model, i get this result:
2136 groups (6408 obs = 3/4 of the individuals) dropped because of all positive or all negative outcomes and also 3 important variables are omitted because they have no within-group variance, the sex of the individual and the fathers and mothers education.
These variables don't change through the years for any individual and this is why its happening, they don't have within-group variance.
My question is if this problem is enough reason to ignore the Hausman test, change the model and run one with random effects or maybe there is some other test that i could do.
Also notice that with the random effects all these variables are significant.
Thank you so much in advance.
Related Posts with Help choosing Fixed effect vs Random effect for a binary panel data regression
check if variable is present and append to local varlistHi, I want to loop over all values of a local varlist and check if a variable of that name is prese…
Interpretation of variables in panel data set.I'm conducting some research for my dissertation on the relationship between military spending, arms…
weighted varibles for latent class modelHi Scholars, I have a dataset that overrepresented respondents in some of important socio-demograph…
Coefplot - without any FEDear Statalist users, I'm trying to make a plot of my regression results using coefplot. I have dat…
Cross sectional dependenceGood Morning, What is the difference between xtpcse and xtscc? My data: - N>T; - Problems: cro…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Help choosing Fixed effect vs Random effect for a binary panel data regression
Post a Comment