Hello everyone,
I am working on a binary panel data regression.
I did the Hausman test to see if I should use fixed effects or random effects for a logit regression. The test is telling me that the correct one to use is the fixed effects, however when I run the model, i get this result:
2136 groups (6408 obs = 3/4 of the individuals) dropped because of all positive or all negative outcomes and also 3 important variables are omitted because they have no within-group variance, the sex of the individual and the fathers and mothers education.
These variables don't change through the years for any individual and this is why its happening, they don't have within-group variance.
My question is if this problem is enough reason to ignore the Hausman test, change the model and run one with random effects or maybe there is some other test that i could do.
Also notice that with the random effects all these variables are significant.
Thank you so much in advance.
Related Posts with Help choosing Fixed effect vs Random effect for a binary panel data regression
OLS and fixed effectsHi, Using OLS, I have panel data of 480 firms (10years). reg lev prof size tang growth liq i.lifec…
Pooled cross section dataHi Stata users I am working with pooled cross section data (randomly sampled 26,000 SMEs over the la…
Multilevel bootstrappingHello, I am interested in bootstrapping multilevel models like this example, from the Stata manual …
STATA counts 'no values' as dots in variablesHi, I have a data sheet with several values including age. From that data I have created groups/var…
ppml_panel_sg and RESET testDear Statalist, I am trying to estimate the RESET and the Park test with the ppml_panel_sg command.…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Help choosing Fixed effect vs Random effect for a binary panel data regression
Post a Comment