Dear Statalists,
I am using -heckman- command to address the self-selection problem. I read from many places that we can use the same elements in both stages of estimation (Z identical to X). However, the constraint of using the same variable is the nonlinearity of inverse Mill's ratio (IMR). My questions are below:
1. How can we measure the nonlinearity of IMR?
2. Can we use VIF to examine the multicollinearity? Then how to estimate VIF for a probit model in the first stage of Heckman?
3. I also spot that some scholars test the normality of first stage probit to verify the nonlinearity, are normality of probit and nonlinearity of IMR the same thing?
Thanks in advance for your help and comments.
Related Posts with Heckman identification: normality of porbit and nonlinearity of inverse Mill's ratio
issue with replacing values with bysortHi all, I have the following situation: Code: +--------------------------------+ | pi…
Unconditional quantile regression when treatment variable is an interaction term of two dummy variablesDear Statalist members, has anyone ever tried to use unconditional quantile regression in stata (ivq…
CSAD and herdingDear all, I am new to Stata. and I am seeking help from experienced users. I am looking for evidenc…
Unconditional quantile regression / pooling together dataDear Statalist members. Has anyone ever used unconditional quantile regression in stata (ivqte comma…
100% Stacked Bar ChartHello, I want to create a stacked bar graph, where the bars equal 100%, representing the percentage …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Heckman identification: normality of porbit and nonlinearity of inverse Mill's ratio
Post a Comment