Dear Statalists,
I am using -heckman- command to address the self-selection problem. I read from many places that we can use the same elements in both stages of estimation (Z identical to X). However, the constraint of using the same variable is the nonlinearity of inverse Mill's ratio (IMR). My questions are below:
1. How can we measure the nonlinearity of IMR?
2. Can we use VIF to examine the multicollinearity? Then how to estimate VIF for a probit model in the first stage of Heckman?
3. I also spot that some scholars test the normality of first stage probit to verify the nonlinearity, are normality of probit and nonlinearity of IMR the same thing?
Thanks in advance for your help and comments.
Related Posts with Heckman identification: normality of porbit and nonlinearity of inverse Mill's ratio
Estimating Productivity adnI am trying to find impact of (Dividends) on (Firm Sales) controlling for the firm characteristics i…
Clean syntax in STATAhi, please help me! I found command that is not recognized in STATA14 but is used in Chaney2012 pape…
marginscontplot problem.Dear All, I have a dataset with two variables (simplified). The basic statistics Code: . sum indep…
Can you combine data vertically?I am looking at data on methods of recycling for towns in the UK for five years, however my data on …
How to create a formlacode year var2 top5 1100 201712 5 1 1100 201712 5 2 1100 201712 5 3 1100 201712 4.9 4 1100 201712 4.…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Heckman identification: normality of porbit and nonlinearity of inverse Mill's ratio
Post a Comment