Dear Statalists,
I am using -heckman- command to address the self-selection problem. I read from many places that we can use the same elements in both stages of estimation (Z identical to X). However, the constraint of using the same variable is the nonlinearity of inverse Mill's ratio (IMR). My questions are below:
1. How can we measure the nonlinearity of IMR?
2. Can we use VIF to examine the multicollinearity? Then how to estimate VIF for a probit model in the first stage of Heckman?
3. I also spot that some scholars test the normality of first stage probit to verify the nonlinearity, are normality of probit and nonlinearity of IMR the same thing?
Thanks in advance for your help and comments.
Related Posts with Heckman identification: normality of porbit and nonlinearity of inverse Mill's ratio
how to incorporate both fixed effects and robust std errors into panel analysisI am doing an event study where i use a panel analysis (different observations on a same day) with d…
Gini decomposition by income sourceHi all, I would like to decompose the Gini coefficient by income source, applying the Lerman-Yitzhak…
standard errors when calculating marginal effects of logisitc regressionHello, I have calculated the marginal effects of my logistic regression with robust standard errors…
Replacing missing values in groupsHi everyone, I am working with a dataset with fiscal years, CIK codes and employee ids. For the fis…
Exporting marginal effects and its confidence intervalsHello, I am estimating average marginal effects using `margins` after `probit` and `ivprobit`. I ne…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Heckman identification: normality of porbit and nonlinearity of inverse Mill's ratio
Post a Comment