Dear Statalists,
I am using -heckman- command to address the self-selection problem. I read from many places that we can use the same elements in both stages of estimation (Z identical to X). However, the constraint of using the same variable is the nonlinearity of inverse Mill's ratio (IMR). My questions are below:
1. How can we measure the nonlinearity of IMR?
2. Can we use VIF to examine the multicollinearity? Then how to estimate VIF for a probit model in the first stage of Heckman?
3. I also spot that some scholars test the normality of first stage probit to verify the nonlinearity, are normality of probit and nonlinearity of IMR the same thing?
Thanks in advance for your help and comments.
Related Posts with Heckman identification: normality of porbit and nonlinearity of inverse Mill's ratio
dynamic probit fixed effects model using "probitfe" r(3900)Hi all, I am working with large dynamic binary panel data with i=53856 and t=11 (total obs. 592416)…
can we set history window and variable window appear at the same time for Stata Maccan we set history window and variable window appear at the same time for Stata Mac? Every time I ne…
Applying HCUP software on NIS data through STATAHello everyone, I'm using NIS data for research, which is a dataset that uses ICD-10 codes to genera…
Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation with Interacted Independent VariableHello! I am conducting a causal mediation analysis in which treatment --> mediator --> outcome…
Proportion test for multiple groupsHi, I want to compare how does use of drug "A" differs across age categories. Total drug A users w…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Heckman identification: normality of porbit and nonlinearity of inverse Mill's ratio
Post a Comment