Dear colleagues,
I am studying the effect of hospital efficiency on absorbing the negative impact of health shocks on mortality rates. The coefficient of the interaction term is significant and has the correct sign. However, the sign of the main effect of hospital_efficiency is wrong (and significant). Is this okay? How can I interpret this counter-intuitive sign, please? Thank you in advance.
Array
Related Posts with Interaction term significant; main terms significant but with an opposite sign
very high VIF in FE: An issue?- Presenting results of regression analysis with splines
- Inclusion of Instrumental Variables in a fixed effects regression.
- Merged dataset but converted date variables inaccurate
- Difference in Difference modeling. How to separate the treated group from the control group in the dataset
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interaction term significant; main terms significant but with an opposite sign
Post a Comment