Dear colleagues,
I am studying the effect of hospital efficiency on absorbing the negative impact of health shocks on mortality rates. The coefficient of the interaction term is significant and has the correct sign. However, the sign of the main effect of hospital_efficiency is wrong (and significant). Is this okay? How can I interpret this counter-intuitive sign, please? Thank you in advance.
Array
Related Posts with Interaction term significant; main terms significant but with an opposite sign
very high VIF in FE: An issue?Hi, I am currently running my model fit diagnostics for my FE model (after Hausman Test lead me the…
Presenting results of regression analysis with splinesDear all, I would like to do a linear regression analysis with splines in Stata 14. My goal is infe…
Inclusion of Instrumental Variables in a fixed effects regression.Hi. I am currently looking into the influence of natural disasters on human capital outcomes, throug…
Merged dataset but converted date variables inaccurateHi I have two datasets, one is compustat data and the other is covenant violations (from Creditor C…
Difference in Difference modeling. How to separate the treated group from the control group in the datasetHello, can anyone please help me on the command to differentiate my control group from treated group…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interaction term significant; main terms significant but with an opposite sign
Post a Comment