Dear colleagues,
I am studying the effect of hospital efficiency on absorbing the negative impact of health shocks on mortality rates. The coefficient of the interaction term is significant and has the correct sign. However, the sign of the main effect of hospital_efficiency is wrong (and significant). Is this okay? How can I interpret this counter-intuitive sign, please? Thank you in advance.
Array
Related Posts with Interaction term significant; main terms significant but with an opposite sign
line graph at country and year level for several variables using levelsofHello all, I have a panel long format dataset that can be found attached containing year and countr…
Saving tabstat results in new variablesHello, I'm using tabstat to generate weighted standard deviations, by year, for two variables in a …
Table command in Stata 17: add column name to first columnHi, I'm exploring the new table and collect commands in Stata 17, and find that it has many useful …
Same model, different dependent variables: Single Y label in the combined graphDear Statalisters, I have troubles using graph combine, I don’t know how to get a single y label fo…
floatplot -legend- optionDear Nick Cox , I have started using your -floatplot- from SSC program. I really like to use it more…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interaction term significant; main terms significant but with an opposite sign
Post a Comment