Dear colleagues,
I am studying the effect of hospital efficiency on absorbing the negative impact of health shocks on mortality rates. The coefficient of the interaction term is significant and has the correct sign. However, the sign of the main effect of hospital_efficiency is wrong (and significant). Is this okay? How can I interpret this counter-intuitive sign, please? Thank you in advance.
Array
Related Posts with Interaction term significant; main terms significant but with an opposite sign
How to move an active STATA15 licence from one device to anotherDear all, I need to move my STATA 15 licence from my current laptop to a new one. How do I need to p…
How to shuffle or randomly assign the values within each group?Hi everyone! This is my first time to post a question here. I am working on a historical population…
How to draw a graph for inverted U-shaped relationships like the graph presented below?Array My regression is: Y1=α1FD1+α2FD1^2+α3Controls, and the results showed this is a bell-shaped re…
Writing likelihood function for interval based dataHi Statalist I am studying the determinants of unemployment spell, which is, in my study, explained …
Formula to standardize a variable without "gen" and "egen"Hello, I am a French student who is starting to work with Stata 16, and I need to find a formulatio…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interaction term significant; main terms significant but with an opposite sign
Post a Comment