Dear colleagues,
I am studying the effect of hospital efficiency on absorbing the negative impact of health shocks on mortality rates. The coefficient of the interaction term is significant and has the correct sign. However, the sign of the main effect of hospital_efficiency is wrong (and significant). Is this okay? How can I interpret this counter-intuitive sign, please? Thank you in advance.
Array
Related Posts with Interaction term significant; main terms significant but with an opposite sign
Loop Through The Same Procedures with Multiple DatasetsHi all, I have several datasets that I would like to do the same procedures to. I have the same gen…
Tempfile invalid file specification[previous code] foreach q in ca cb cc cd ce { preserve gen var = "`q'" tempfile ``q'' save ``q'', r…
Any alternative to svy: bsqreg ? [Since svy does not support bsqreg]I was wondering if there are any alternatives to using svyset since bsqreg does not support svy and …
Recode returns incorrect codeI am try to execute the following code Code: recode educn (1=0)(2/4=1)(5=3)(6=5)(12=15)(10=12)(8=1…
Unable to refer to sreturned varlist outside of programI wrote an sclass program which returns two variable lists in separate macros: Code: capture prog…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interaction term significant; main terms significant but with an opposite sign
Post a Comment