I am running Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) on a highly unbalanced panel data (with 26 periods: 13 pre-shock and 13 post-shock), for a diff-in-diff analysis with fixed effect.
1. Is it flawed if I match treated and control groups in *both* pre & post shock periods (rather than just pre-shock periods) with a set of covariates?
2. In general, I force Stata to use the non-coarsened version of period *period(#0)* in my CEM command, so the matching occurs exactly within each period of the panel. Obviously, individual A may be matched with B in t1, but with C in t2. Does it sound fine?
3. After dropping unmatched observations, may I use my diff-in-diff analysis without using the weights. Meaning, I use CEM just to make the control and treated groups comparable (reducing the noise).
Many thanks
Related Posts with Coarsened Exact Matching in unbalanced panel data
Correlation between two long time seriesDear all, I want to test the correlation between two time series with large T, for example, the pri…
Plot number of events per month, over time (simple)Hi Folks. Sorry Stata beginner here, but wondered if others had a good approach to what I am trying …
Table of descriptive data. Possible to switch rows and columns using tabstat?Hello, In my dataset I have 3 groups (1, 2, 3) and 20 continous variables (A, B, C, etc. ) for each …
mean comparison for panel dataDear All, I have a panel data with three waves and i am comparing the mean difference (mean comparis…
How to estimate the marital status (Married and widowed) using the information on the Relationship of person to household headHello, everyone I am having a cross-sectional data on the relationship of person to household head. …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Coarsened Exact Matching in unbalanced panel data
Post a Comment