I am running Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) on a highly unbalanced panel data (with 26 periods: 13 pre-shock and 13 post-shock), for a diff-in-diff analysis with fixed effect.
1. Is it flawed if I match treated and control groups in *both* pre & post shock periods (rather than just pre-shock periods) with a set of covariates?
2. In general, I force Stata to use the non-coarsened version of period *period(#0)* in my CEM command, so the matching occurs exactly within each period of the panel. Obviously, individual A may be matched with B in t1, but with C in t2. Does it sound fine?
3. After dropping unmatched observations, may I use my diff-in-diff analysis without using the weights. Meaning, I use CEM just to make the control and treated groups comparable (reducing the noise).
Many thanks
Related Posts with Coarsened Exact Matching in unbalanced panel data
Creating a variable as a matrix of five othersHi, My dataset has variables such as province, and five other items (club church library hospital s…
Entropy BalancingHi everyone, I want to examine the effect of a treatment on an observation group with a Diff-in-Diff…
error in reshapingi have the data ----------------------- copy starting from the next line ----------------------- Co…
Why is TFP calculated by prodest+acf+translog much bigger that TFP calculated by prodest+acf?Dear statalists: I want to use prodest to estimate TFP,but my production function is a translog-for…
Including both Industry and Country fixed effectsDear Stata Members I have seen the following model based on a paper Code: Delta Cashit= b0+ b1EPUi…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Coarsened Exact Matching in unbalanced panel data
Post a Comment