I am running Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) on a highly unbalanced panel data (with 26 periods: 13 pre-shock and 13 post-shock), for a diff-in-diff analysis with fixed effect.
1. Is it flawed if I match treated and control groups in *both* pre & post shock periods (rather than just pre-shock periods) with a set of covariates?
2. In general, I force Stata to use the non-coarsened version of period *period(#0)* in my CEM command, so the matching occurs exactly within each period of the panel. Obviously, individual A may be matched with B in t1, but with C in t2. Does it sound fine?
3. After dropping unmatched observations, may I use my diff-in-diff analysis without using the weights. Meaning, I use CEM just to make the control and treated groups comparable (reducing the noise).
Many thanks
Related Posts with Coarsened Exact Matching in unbalanced panel data
Main effect in logistic regression with interactionHello, I have a logistic regression model with interaction term (variable##sex). Variable is catego…
Unit root in variablesFor my study I am writing a research paper for the first time and I seem to be having a problem with…
Generating means for a region using only one observation per householdHi, I have a question regarding generating averages. I have one column with a unique Houshold ID fo…
Finding and plotting the trend of the weighted average of variable Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input double total_asse…
How to Run Random Forest for Time-Series DataHi, I am writing this post to ask whether there is any Stata command (or doing manually) to apply t…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Coarsened Exact Matching in unbalanced panel data
Post a Comment