In Roodman's 2009 paper, he notes that a 'very low instrument count also weakens the Hansen test'. Is there any guidance for how low this is relative to the number of regressors used, for example, if I had 10 instruments and 6 regressors would there be the potential of this test being weakened?
Also, I am unsure how to interpret the difference in Hansen test on Stata. Under the null of joint instrument validity, do I require the 'Hansen test excluding group' result to be over 0.05 (5% significance level) or the 'difference (null h=exogenous)' result to be over 0.05?
Related Posts with Hansen Test
spxtregress is arbitrarily dropping regressorsI'm trying to use Stata's built-in commands to estimate a spatial panel model (i.e. I'm using spxtre…
Spatial model (xsmle) with spatial DV and IV lags and spatial errors?Is there a way to estimate a model with (1) a spatially lagged dependent variable, (2) spatially lag…
Bootstrap with xtabond2Hello everyone, I am a beginner researcher. Now, I try my data with xtabond2 command. I see almost e…
Omitted coefficients using reghdfeHello, I am estimating regressions that include different fixed effects and variables whose coeffic…
Zero LR test statistic for melogitWhen using the following code Code: melogit goodprog i.screen i.dxagecat i.remoteness || sa3: , or…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Hansen Test
Post a Comment