Hi Everyone,
I am running an ARDL - ECM on time series data containing continuous variables. 3 of my variables are ratios (fdi, emissions and trade openness). The log likelihood when I log transform the ratios is positive. When I run the regressions without transforming the variables into logs its negative
I have read that ratios do not have to be converted to log form. In this regard, does the negative log likelihood make my results invalid or say that the estimations are not of great quality?
Should I run regressions in log form or just maintain ratios
Thanks
Related Posts with Negative log likelihood
Regression interpretationHi, I would like to ask for some clarification on regression interpretation. The dependent variabl…
Revised module – parseuas – available from SSCThanks to Kit Baum, the revised version 1.4 of our module – parseuas – is now available for download…
clan: Stata command for cluster-level analysis of a cluster-randomised trial now available on SSCDear all, Thanks to Kit Baum, I am happy to announce a new Stata command, clan, is available in SSC…
Time Trends for Panel DataHello, I am writing a descriptive paper on substance use estimates across 4 years (2013-2017) using…
Fama and MacBeth two-step procedure with logit regressionsDear members, Is there a possibility to run a Fama and MacBeth two-step procedure in STATA where lo…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Negative log likelihood
Post a Comment