Hi Everyone,
I am running an ARDL - ECM on time series data containing continuous variables. 3 of my variables are ratios (fdi, emissions and trade openness). The log likelihood when I log transform the ratios is positive. When I run the regressions without transforming the variables into logs its negative
I have read that ratios do not have to be converted to log form. In this regard, does the negative log likelihood make my results invalid or say that the estimations are not of great quality?
Should I run regressions in log form or just maintain ratios
Thanks
Related Posts with Negative log likelihood
Alternative to inlist() - expression too longHi, Relatively basic question: I am looking for a concise (1 line) alternative to inlist that would…
Bar Graph with datesDear Statalist, I have a list of several countries with dates of COVID-19 lockdown. I would like to…
Time Series: how to obtain a date variable collapsing year and month (dm)?I have time series data of an index of employment in Brazilian industries. Part of the data is repro…
Merge 2 datasets by range of datesHi, I would like to merge 2 datasets by range of dates and with an identifier (gvkey). So far, I ha…
Is Durbin–Wu–Hausman test a valid test when using generated regressor without any declaration of IVs?Dear All, Recently I have an exactly the same question with an old faq on Stata about Durbin–Wu–Hau…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Negative log likelihood
Post a Comment