Hi Everyone,
I am running an ARDL - ECM on time series data containing continuous variables. 3 of my variables are ratios (fdi, emissions and trade openness). The log likelihood when I log transform the ratios is positive. When I run the regressions without transforming the variables into logs its negative
I have read that ratios do not have to be converted to log form. In this regard, does the negative log likelihood make my results invalid or say that the estimations are not of great quality?
Should I run regressions in log form or just maintain ratios
Thanks
Related Posts with Negative log likelihood
Interaction effect between two non-dichotomous categorical variablesDear all, I would like to view the interaction effect between education level and age while trying …
Piecewise regressionDear Statalist. I was wondering how to know what intial value to enter when doing a piecewise regres…
multi level ordinal regression ?crossed effectHi, Hi, I want to run a multi-level ordinal logistic regression in which people have completed an…
combine variable names Hello statalisters, I have a question regarding stata operation. I have 2 lists of variable names a…
Possible issue with diff in diff regression?Hello, I am trying to do a diff in diff approach where my regression code looks like this Code: …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Negative log likelihood
Post a Comment