1) Can someone point me to a resource that explains why the linearized S.E. and the logit transformed 95% CI are different when I do svy: proportion using the subpopcommand instead of the if var == x command?
2) Is it ok if my subpop variable consists of 1, 0, missing?
3) When calculating the proportions, Stata deleted cases that had missing data on the outcome. How does this affect the interpretation of results? Are all the things I set in svyset(weights, clustering) still valid?
4) I understand that I could do multiple imputation for the missing data, however, could I instead try to show that the cases with the missing data are not significantly different from the cases without missing data, on several demographic variables (gender, SES, etc.) and argue thus that the sample is still representative of the population? Have others taken this approach before?
Related Posts with svy, subpop, missing values
Tabs for multiple subgroups in one tableI am hoping to run tabs for by various subgroups (different job roles, in this instance). For my tw…
M Jones ModelHi,Is the following code true for the m jones model? data: 2010-2017 for 35 country and 24 industry …
Generate spatial weight matrix by using "spweight"Hi everybody, I am working on Emad A. Shehata's spatial command modules, but I got a trouble in cre…
Do you need to use the same number of data observations for different types of regression?Hello, I want to perform a linear (1 independent variable) and a multiple regression with a sample …
Grs testHi Statalist Members! I am conducting a research on variation of the average returns on 12 portfoli…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to svy, subpop, missing values
Post a Comment