Hi,
I have used the Mundlak approach (correlated random effects) to regress my dependent variable income on race (my variable of interest) and several control factors. Also, I have included an interaction term of the categorical variable: religion and the continuous variable: number of dependent children.
For my OLS and random effects regressions, I used the command: margin religion ,dydx(dependentchildren) to interpret the interaction term. However, I am unsure whether this is the correct approach for the Mundlak method as there are also meaned and demeaned variables of dependent children.
I have attached my do-file below.
Would this be the correct method and if not how can this be done?
Many thanks
Related Posts with Mundlak Approach/Interaction Term
Ordered Logit, Multinomial Logit- InterpretationsI am trying to run ordered logit for a dependent variable that takes values -1,0,1. Suppose educatio…
Effective Reproductive NumberHello! Is there a way to calculate Effective Reproductive Number (Rt) in STATA? Thank you very muc…
Non-normal distribution of latent variable in structural equations modelling - transformation?I have a simple path model with several latent variables that are ostensibly well enough indicated b…
Tobit with vce(robust) or notHi, When I run tobit model specifying vce(robust), it does F test to test the hypothesis that the co…
Constrained optimization in StataDear Stata uses, I am having a constant optimization problem to solve in Stata I am having three var…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Mundlak Approach/Interaction Term
Post a Comment