Hi,
I have used the Mundlak approach (correlated random effects) to regress my dependent variable income on race (my variable of interest) and several control factors. Also, I have included an interaction term of the categorical variable: religion and the continuous variable: number of dependent children.
For my OLS and random effects regressions, I used the command: margin religion ,dydx(dependentchildren) to interpret the interaction term. However, I am unsure whether this is the correct approach for the Mundlak method as there are also meaned and demeaned variables of dependent children.
I have attached my do-file below.
Would this be the correct method and if not how can this be done?
Many thanks
Related Posts with Mundlak Approach/Interaction Term
keeping soundex started with a specific letterI have a dataset and want to keep a number of variables - Soundex started with a letter, for example…
"Subtracting" one string variable from another string variableI'm cleaning up a government dataset that I need some help on. For the sake of simplicity, let's say…
Panel VAR Diagnostics / Assumptions.Greetings Statalist Users and team. I'm working on a panel data VAR model using pvar package. Where…
Creating Tables by LoopsHello, I am trying create a table with 4 columns and 7 rows by using a for loop. Could anyone help m…
Tabulate CommandHello, I am new to the stata and trying to interpret the tabulate command with 2 variables. What sho…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Mundlak Approach/Interaction Term
Post a Comment