Hi,
I have used the Mundlak approach (correlated random effects) to regress my dependent variable income on race (my variable of interest) and several control factors. Also, I have included an interaction term of the categorical variable: religion and the continuous variable: number of dependent children.
For my OLS and random effects regressions, I used the command: margin religion ,dydx(dependentchildren) to interpret the interaction term. However, I am unsure whether this is the correct approach for the Mundlak method as there are also meaned and demeaned variables of dependent children.
I have attached my do-file below.
Would this be the correct method and if not how can this be done?
Many thanks
Related Posts with Mundlak Approach/Interaction Term
Fama French: Calculating portfolio returns within sub-portfolios (aggregation of monthly returns) in different dimensionsHey all, I hope you are doing all well. I would like to calculate portfolio returns for an individ…
Question: Merging observations in one variable while simultaneously summing the numbers of the related observations in another variableHello I am new to this forum, so sorry if this question has been asked before (tried searching for …
Merging DatasetsDear all, I am trying to merge two datasets that contain sectoral information on value added, numbe…
logistic risk prediction modelHi, I have developed a risk prediction model for Outcome (binary) based on 4 binary variables. I de…
Stata 16: garbled character in ado & help file.Dear Stata users, Some ado & help file which displays correctly under Stata 13 are now giving r…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Mundlak Approach/Interaction Term
Post a Comment