Hi,
I have used the Mundlak approach (correlated random effects) to regress my dependent variable income on race (my variable of interest) and several control factors. Also, I have included an interaction term of the categorical variable: religion and the continuous variable: number of dependent children.
For my OLS and random effects regressions, I used the command: margin religion ,dydx(dependentchildren) to interpret the interaction term. However, I am unsure whether this is the correct approach for the Mundlak method as there are also meaned and demeaned variables of dependent children.
I have attached my do-file below.
Would this be the correct method and if not how can this be done?
Many thanks
Related Posts with Mundlak Approach/Interaction Term
plot hazard ratio and confidence intervalsGood morning, I have a basic question. I'm starting with stata running a cox model xi:stcox i.terti…
Case-crossover design and predictive performanceHi all, Thank you in advance for your comments and suggestions! We are conducting a case-crossover…
How to display the mean on a graph pieHello. Is there a way to display the mean when I create a graph pie ? My current code is Code: g…
How to change a trinary variable into a binary with label in 1 lineHello. I have to recode a trinary variable "a6a" : 1=small, 2=medium, 3=large. Into a binary variab…
Output of 'ci proportions' depends on variable formatWhy does the result of 'ci proportions x' depend on the format of variable x? Very strange. Using ve…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Mundlak Approach/Interaction Term
Post a Comment