Dear all,
I have a statistical-oriented question regarding the choice of time and regional fixed-effects in Stata. I need to pick the level at which I want to introduce fixed-effects in a simple regression design. I have at my disposal a database of survey's answers in around 300 regions in 28 countries spanning 80 months. However, I have some holes in my dataset, which means that a given region hasn't answered each month of the 80 months. For example, a region in Austria might only have answered in January and December and another region in France only answered in 6 months.
Hence my question is... I would like to introduce fixed effects controls at the finest level for both dimensions (i.e monthly and regional FE) but I am afraid this would "vacuum" all the variance in my sample. Do you have any insight on how to check for FE relevance in these kind of cases because I have to admit that my econometrics education has unfortunately omitted this kind of trade-off encountered by researchers.
Hope my question is clear enough and somebody can shed some light on this issue.
Thanks in advance,
Stanley
Related Posts with Fixed-Effects Choice
Use Asrol and natural Log.Hi, I asked this question yesterday but it was not mentioned in the title so I followed the advice …
Unit root in panel dataDear Statalist, Question: if I have a number of variables and only some of them contain unit root …
graph editor vs commandhi together i have following graph by command a b c d e 96 16 43 34 16 graph hbar (sum) a b c…
IV Regression with fixed effects an three instrementsHello all, i am currently trying to run an iv regression with fixed effects. I need to instrument e…
Merging panel dataHi there, I have panel data with each survey providing multiple STATA datasets from that sweep. Eac…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Fixed-Effects Choice
Post a Comment