Dear all,
I have a statistical-oriented question regarding the choice of time and regional fixed-effects in Stata. I need to pick the level at which I want to introduce fixed-effects in a simple regression design. I have at my disposal a database of survey's answers in around 300 regions in 28 countries spanning 80 months. However, I have some holes in my dataset, which means that a given region hasn't answered each month of the 80 months. For example, a region in Austria might only have answered in January and December and another region in France only answered in 6 months.
Hence my question is... I would like to introduce fixed effects controls at the finest level for both dimensions (i.e monthly and regional FE) but I am afraid this would "vacuum" all the variance in my sample. Do you have any insight on how to check for FE relevance in these kind of cases because I have to admit that my econometrics education has unfortunately omitted this kind of trade-off encountered by researchers.
Hope my question is clear enough and somebody can shed some light on this issue.
Thanks in advance,
Stanley
Related Posts with Fixed-Effects Choice
Maki's CointegrationI was wondering if anyone has written an ado file for Maki's cointegration: Maki, Daiki, (2012), Tes…
Average and Median values by groupDear All Will appreciate if you can help me on the following query. The following data shows firms…
Two limit Tobit with robust and clustered standard errorsHello, would someone have any help on how to run a two limit tobit model with robust and clustered s…
How can I select observations containing specific words?Dear all, I need to pick persons A & B whose position include exact "Independent" from the list…
Opposite sign for ivprobit marginal effect compared to ivprobit coefficient, ivreg, probit marginal effectData and code download link (Just 91KB): https://drive.google.com/drive/folde...2M?usp=sharing In t…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Fixed-Effects Choice
Post a Comment