I’m hoping to solicit some advice from those of you that are familiar with survival analysis. I’m still a bit new to the subject, but would like to get my feet wet with some firm-level data. I’ve read through a couple of helpful resources, but am still a bit puzzled as to properly stset this particular set up. The closest example that I can find related to my current setup on Statalist is this thread (https://www.statalist.org/forums/for...re-using-stset).
Below there is a sample of my data. It’s confidential so it’s been heavily altered. The data a firm level data from Q1-2008 to Q3-2014. I have a firm id (firm), a quarterly variable (quarter), the employment count (emp), when the firm came into business (register_date), when the firm went out of business (termination_date), and the major industry (naics). I’ve removed the other covariates for simplicity.
Here’s what I’ve done – I’m not sure if this is right, but would appreciate any feedback!
Code:
gen failure = 0 replace failure = 1 if quarter == termination_date bys firm (quarter) : replace failure = . if failure[_n-1] == 1 bys firm (quarter) : replace failure = . if failure[_n-1] == . & quarter >= termination_date bys firm (quarter) : replace failure = . if employment == . & quarter < termination_date stset quarter, failure(failure == 1) replace _t = _t – 191
Code:
* Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input int(firm quarter) float employment str6 naics int(register_date termination_date) 1 192 . "54" 204 207 1 193 . "54" 204 207 1 194 . "54" 204 207 1 195 . "54" 204 207 1 196 . "54" 204 207 1 197 . "54" 204 207 1 198 . "54" 204 207 1 199 . "54" 204 207 1 200 . "54" 204 207 1 201 . "54" 204 207 1 202 . "54" 204 207 1 203 . "54" 204 207 1 204 38 "54" 204 207 1 205 55 "54" 204 207 1 206 6 "54" 204 207 1 207 66 "54" 204 207 1 208 . "54" 204 207 1 209 . "54" 204 207 1 210 . "54" 204 207 1 211 . "54" 204 207 1 212 . "54" 204 207 1 213 . "54" 204 207 1 214 . "54" 204 207 1 215 . "54" 204 207 1 216 . "54" 204 207 1 217 . "54" 204 207 1 218 . "54" 204 207 2 192 . "54" 204 . 2 193 . "54" 204 . 2 194 . "54" 204 . 2 195 . "54" 204 . 2 196 . "54" 204 . 2 197 . "54" 204 . 2 198 . "54" 204 . 2 199 . "54" 204 . 2 200 . "54" 204 . 2 201 . "54" 204 . 2 202 . "54" 204 . 2 203 . "54" 204 . 2 204 27 "54" 204 . 2 205 39 "54" 204 . 2 206 21 "54" 204 . 2 207 20 "54" 204 . 2 208 66 "54" 204 . 2 209 5 "54" 204 . 2 210 2 "54" 204 . 2 211 29 "54" 204 . 2 212 26 "54" 204 . 2 213 24 "54" 204 . 2 214 6 "54" 204 . 2 215 10 "54" 204 . 2 216 22 "54" 204 . 2 217 5 "54" 204 . 2 218 20 "54" 204 . 3 192 . "51" 204 215 3 193 . "51" 204 215 3 194 . "51" 204 215 3 195 . "51" 204 215 3 196 . "51" 204 215 3 197 . "51" 204 215 3 198 . "51" 204 215 3 199 . "51" 204 215 3 200 . "51" 204 215 3 201 . "51" 204 215 3 202 . "51" 204 215 3 203 . "51" 204 215 3 204 220 "51" 204 215 3 205 237 "51" 204 215 3 206 215 "51" 204 215 3 207 361 "51" 204 215 3 208 225 "51" 204 215 3 209 219 "51" 204 215 3 210 338 "51" 204 215 3 211 398 "51" 204 215 3 212 123 "51" 204 215 3 213 37 "51" 204 215 3 214 37 "51" 204 215 3 215 0 "51" 204 215 3 216 . "51" 204 215 3 217 . "51" 204 215 3 218 . "51" 204 215 4 192 . "53" 204 . 4 193 . "53" 204 . 4 194 . "53" 204 . 4 195 . "53" 204 . 4 196 . "53" 204 . 4 197 . "53" 204 . 4 198 . "53" 204 . 4 199 . "53" 204 . 4 200 . "53" 204 . 4 201 . "53" 204 . 4 202 . "53" 204 . 4 203 . "53" 204 . 4 204 6 "53" 204 . 4 205 15 "53" 204 . 4 206 35 "53" 204 . 4 207 34 "53" 204 . 4 208 49 "53" 204 . 4 209 31 "53" 204 . 4 210 7 "53" 204 . end format %tq quarter format %tq register_date format %tq termination_date
0 Response to Advice on survival analysis setup
Post a Comment