Hello,
I am new to this forum and new to econometrics, so I was running a fixed effects regression but I found my main independent variable of interest to be statistically insignificant using the fixed effects estimator, when I checked the within variation of that variable it was fairly small (0.06 standard deviation), could this small within variation be the cause of the variable being insignificant using FE and could it warrant the use of the random effects estimator instead ?
Any help or points in the right direction would be much appreciated. Thanks
Related Posts with Fixed effects vs random effects
Easier way to get casewise statistics using tabstat?Hi, I need a command/code that help me to get casewise descriptive statistics using "tabstat" witho…
Support: most efficient way to enter dataHi everyone, I am a total newbie to Stata, so perhaps some of you can help me with this issue: For…
Pooled OLS and Random EffectsHello everyone, Was just concerned as I have a set of panel data obvservations, and when running reg…
Questions about Logit regression applicable in my research design.Hello, everyone. I am not new to use Statalist, but this is the first time I am not sure I find an …
conflicting results with command ivprobit and marginsHi all! When I ran ivprobit, I got positive and significant coefficient for my endogenous independen…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Fixed effects vs random effects
Post a Comment