Hello,
I am new to this forum and new to econometrics, so I was running a fixed effects regression but I found my main independent variable of interest to be statistically insignificant using the fixed effects estimator, when I checked the within variation of that variable it was fairly small (0.06 standard deviation), could this small within variation be the cause of the variable being insignificant using FE and could it warrant the use of the random effects estimator instead ?
Any help or points in the right direction would be much appreciated. Thanks
Related Posts with Fixed effects vs random effects
Not normally distributed errors after controlling for time fixed effectsHello everyone, I am running a regression where I would like to control for both region and time fix…
test of proportions using prtestHi statalist, I am trying to run a two sample test of proportion using two groups (women who report…
Running mi:reshape after imputation (longitudinal dataset)Hi All I imputed (25 imputations) my longitudinal dataset (in the wide format) which seems to have …
please help me, what is the best model or method of estimation?hello , i have panel data unbalanced N=25 T=9 for 20 cross-section and 7 for 5 cross-section all obs…
JointPoint / test of secular trendsDear all, I've calcuted incidence rates (using Poisson with offset[logtime] and 1-year age bands and…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Fixed effects vs random effects
Post a Comment