Hello,
I am new to this forum and new to econometrics, so I was running a fixed effects regression but I found my main independent variable of interest to be statistically insignificant using the fixed effects estimator, when I checked the within variation of that variable it was fairly small (0.06 standard deviation), could this small within variation be the cause of the variable being insignificant using FE and could it warrant the use of the random effects estimator instead ?
Any help or points in the right direction would be much appreciated. Thanks
Related Posts with Fixed effects vs random effects
Dipendent Double-Sorting 25 PortfoliosDear all, I am struggling to replicate the FF-25 portfolios with a variant, I should employ a depend…
Which Flavor of ADF Estimation Does Stata Use?Hey Everyone, with WLS/ADF estimation there are different flavors out there that are being used in …
Generate variables with forvalsHello Statalist, I have a dataset which contains the following variables: firm (every firm has an as…
Interaction between variables changes the results fundamentally!Dear All, I would appreciate your help on the following please: The correlation between y and x1 x2 …
Weighted least squares (WLS) with wls0 and regwlsDear Statalist, I am conducting a long-run event study with the use of the Fama French 3 Factors mod…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Fixed effects vs random effects
Post a Comment