Hello,
I am new to this forum and new to econometrics, so I was running a fixed effects regression but I found my main independent variable of interest to be statistically insignificant using the fixed effects estimator, when I checked the within variation of that variable it was fairly small (0.06 standard deviation), could this small within variation be the cause of the variable being insignificant using FE and could it warrant the use of the random effects estimator instead ?
Any help or points in the right direction would be much appreciated. Thanks
Related Posts with Fixed effects vs random effects
'predict' after runmlwinHi Statalist, I am running a cross classified model using runmlwin. Previously, I had used meqrlogi…
ssd sem results differ from raw data sem results stataUsing two different datasets, I cannot get stata to give me comparable efa/sem results when using su…
max min commandDear all, I'm trying to use max command but i get "command max is unrecognized". Is there any other …
Normalization of variables with scores in graph lineDear Statalist users, I'm a PhD student and stata beginner, and probably my question would appear s…
Non-parametric tests in difference-in-difference (rank-test)Hi Statalist, I have conducted a difference-in-difference using ROA on firms undertaking a SEO matc…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Fixed effects vs random effects
Post a Comment