Using two different datasets, I cannot get stata to give me comparable efa/sem results when using summary statistics vs. raw data. I am not sure what I am missing...
The raw data is from:
use http://www.stata-press.com/data/r15/sem_1fmm
The summary data and basic efa syntax are as follows:
clear
ssd init x1 x2 x3 x4
ssd set obs 500
ssd set correlations 1.0 \ .4537 1.0 \ .4491 .5091 1.0 \ .6525 .6801 .6975 1.0
ssd set means 99.518 99.954 99.052 94.474
ssd set sd 14.35402 14.1939 14.26395 70.11603
[OR]
clear
ssd init x1 x2 x3 x4
ssd set obs 500
ssd set means 99.518 99.954 99.052 94.474
ssd set sd 14.35402 14.1939 14.26395 70.11603
#delimit;
ssd set correlations
1.0 \
.4537 1.0 \
.4491 .5091 1.0 \
.6525 .6801 .6975 1.0 ;
#delimit cr
ssd status
ssd list
save "C:\Users\...\Desktop\_EFA.dta"
cd "C:\Users\...\Desktop"
use _EFA
factor x1-x4, ml factors(1)
*Question: what about using ssd or my code leads stata (v. 15.1) to produce not even remotely close results?
Related Posts with ssd sem results differ from raw data sem results stata
No triangle line on funnel plot (Network meta analysis)I try to draw funnel plot but it does not show tri-angel line. …
Granger causality testsHello, I'm trying to run a Granger causality test on panel data to check whether bank profits (depe…
ivmediate, full optionDear All, I'm trying to run the ivmediate command with full option with the following code: Code:…
Obtaining marginal effects after using the "bayes" prefixDear all, Assume that you run a model with the "bayes" prefix. For the sake of the argument, let us…
gosrt are not stable when identifiers are the same, how to make it the order stable?I find when use gsort var, when var has some duplicates of obervation, the order after gsorting are …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to ssd sem results differ from raw data sem results stata
Post a Comment