Dear All, What is the minimal group size for level sufficient to use "sts test var, trend"? Specifically, having many levels in var, say, var = 1,2,3,..15 I want to check the trend for survivor functions for 1, 2, ,,,15 but not sure what is the minimal groups size required for each level var = 1, 2, 3, ....15. I know we can use this also for, say, var = 1, 1.5, 2.5 , .... but can't find any suggested minimal group size for each var value to make sure I can use this "sts test var, trend" test. Stata calculates this even having one observation for some levels (so it looks I can do kind of univariate analysis for continous variable, but one-observation survivor function used in testing the trend for all the levels rather doesn't make sense). If using "sts test var, trend strata(dummy)", what would be then minimal group required for all levels in dummy==0 and in dummy==1. Many Thanks.
Related Posts with sts var, trend
"already preserved" errorHi, I have been running a piece of code through various universe of assets and I am getting the "al…
Pescadf output interpretationi am working on panel data having cross sectional dependence problem . as it shows cross sectional d…
logit vs probit in level/change specificationsDear all, I have to investigate the determinants of a certain ordinal dependent variable which can …
gsem in stataHow can I use gsem when I have dependent binary variables? Using the example in the manual: Code: …
Exporting variable's LabelHii All, I was trying to export variable's labels in excel using [export excel using "Data", firstro…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to sts var, trend
Post a Comment