Dear All, What is the minimal group size for level sufficient to use "sts test var, trend"? Specifically, having many levels in var, say, var = 1,2,3,..15 I want to check the trend for survivor functions for 1, 2, ,,,15 but not sure what is the minimal groups size required for each level var = 1, 2, 3, ....15. I know we can use this also for, say, var = 1, 1.5, 2.5 , .... but can't find any suggested minimal group size for each var value to make sure I can use this "sts test var, trend" test. Stata calculates this even having one observation for some levels (so it looks I can do kind of univariate analysis for continous variable, but one-observation survivor function used in testing the trend for all the levels rather doesn't make sense). If using "sts test var, trend strata(dummy)", what would be then minimal group required for all levels in dummy==0 and in dummy==1. Many Thanks.
Related Posts with sts var, trend
Accounting for time difference in forecasts when using repeated cross sectional dataI need to forecast repeated cross sectional data (survey data) with (dep. var.) monthly electricity…
Returning the name of a variable that takes on the maximum value within a set of other variables?Hey folks. I have a dataset with respondents reporting how many visits they took to certain recreati…
Handling missing data in Stata: imputation and likelihood based approachesDear All, I have a question on the presentation, entitled "Handling missing data in Stata: imputati…
Interpreting a fixed effects regression whether the treatment variable is binaryHello all, There have been similar posts about this interpretation but I can't find any with the sa…
multinomial logit questionI am trying to run a multinomial logit as y being the number of credit cards an individual has. I re…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to sts var, trend
Post a Comment