Dear Stata forum members,
Would you please help with interpretation of my obtained results. I have one continuous variable and one binary variable in my model. When I estimate their individual effects on DV, their coefficients are positive and significant which suport the hypotheses. However, when I take their interaction, the main effects become insignificant ( the coefficient of the continuous variable even became negative) though the interaction term is significant. Should I focus on the interaction term without looking at the main effects? Or is something wrong with my data and or model?
Thanks in advance!
Related Posts with Interaction term and main effects
Constraints in a nonlinear regression with interaction termsDear all, I am running a fractional logit model, using fracglm, where Vote (the percentages of vote…
Tobit model with binary endogenous regressorsDear All, Ivtobit is for Tobit model with continuous endogenous regressors. My endogenous regressor …
Problems with lower bound for a proportion below 0 for "teffects" commandDear Statalisters, I'm using Statalist 15.1. By using the "teffects" command in a case of binary out…
testhere is my code: Code: regress y x1 x2 estimates store my_regress some question text HTML Cod…
Full example of using SEM estimates as regression coefficients (CFA)Hello, I am trying to construct indices for well being, stress and environmental concern. I am usin…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interaction term and main effects
Post a Comment