Hello. I have a continuous outcome variable, binary endogenous variable, and continuous instrument.
I have estimated the effect of the endogenous variable on the outcome variable using etregress with maximum likelihood and with a control function. I've also estimated it with 2sls. The control function and 2sls
results are very similar, but etregress with maximum likelihood is very different. Why is that occuring? From reading the documentation, my guess it that the maximum likelihood approach requires parametrizing the unobservables as
jointly normal, while the control function only requires univariate normals? Is that right?
Related Posts with Etregress ML vs Etregress Control Function vs 2sls
how to choose between Fixed effects model and Pooled OLS model ?hello everyone, i'm currenlty doing a research for my masters' thesis, and i'm doing a panel study o…
Turn off -beep- in stataI could not find an existing topic for this, but how do I turn the beep in stata? I found it very an…
Chow test for structural break in 2SLS processI am using ivregress in STATA 16. I want to understand how can I apply chow test for structural brea…
Statalist Site error message : "empty response"Hello, Since yesterday, I noticed a strange behavior in the Statalist's Web site. Whenever I try t…
Chow test for structural brake in 2SLS processI am using ivregress in STATA 16. I want to understand how can I apply chow test for structural brea…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Etregress ML vs Etregress Control Function vs 2sls
Post a Comment