Hello. I have a continuous outcome variable, binary endogenous variable, and continuous instrument.
I have estimated the effect of the endogenous variable on the outcome variable using etregress with maximum likelihood and with a control function. I've also estimated it with 2sls. The control function and 2sls
results are very similar, but etregress with maximum likelihood is very different. Why is that occuring? From reading the documentation, my guess it that the maximum likelihood approach requires parametrizing the unobservables as
jointly normal, while the control function only requires univariate normals? Is that right?
Related Posts with Etregress ML vs Etregress Control Function vs 2sls
Low within variation independent variable and fixed effectsDear all, I am running a regression where one of my (independent) variables of interest has low wit…
weighting variables before collapsing survey data in STATAHello everyone, I am using 4 rounds of a labor force panel survey for the years (1998, 2006, 2012 a…
How to transforming data using loopsI have two or three ideas of using loops to achieve data transformation for data manipulation, but I…
Clustered bar graph with multiple categorical variablesHello, I am hoping to create a clustered bar graph to compare satisfaction with information receive…
BGV (Between Group Variance)Dear Statalist, I would like to measure inequity through BGV (Between Group Variance) for non-order…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Etregress ML vs Etregress Control Function vs 2sls
Post a Comment