Hello. I have a continuous outcome variable, binary endogenous variable, and continuous instrument.
I have estimated the effect of the endogenous variable on the outcome variable using etregress with maximum likelihood and with a control function. I've also estimated it with 2sls. The control function and 2sls
results are very similar, but etregress with maximum likelihood is very different. Why is that occuring? From reading the documentation, my guess it that the maximum likelihood approach requires parametrizing the unobservables as
jointly normal, while the control function only requires univariate normals? Is that right?
Related Posts with Etregress ML vs Etregress Control Function vs 2sls
how to calculate the typical paper:change in relative wage1963-1987: suppl and demand in stata(is there an order?)does anyone know how to calculate the typical paper:change in relative wage1963-1987: suppl and dema…
set quarterly datesDear All, I have this dataset, Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install data…
Generating variable for a range of datesHi, I am looking to create a variable that encompasses several dates. I am doing a project on produ…
Trouble working with panel data and including too many dummy variablesI am analyzing public and charter high schools in the state of California. I am interested in Charte…
Multilevel crossed interaction for factor variableDear all I'm working in Stata 14.2. I'm doing a two-level logit model with melogit. I'm interested i…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Etregress ML vs Etregress Control Function vs 2sls
Post a Comment