Hello,
We are estimating a model with binary Y and binary X, using the CMP command. In our main analysis, everything works perfectly.
However, for running a placebo test, we then create a random dummy variable which we use in place of our X variable. On re-doing the CMP estimation, the model fails to converge. The iterations continue to be concave. When we use the "nonrtol" option, it outputs a result (although it stays concave). However, we only get the coefficient but the standard errors, p-values, confidence intervals are all missing. We are also able to estimate margins of this random X variable after that. But is this interpretable? What is this nonrtol option doing such that we get a result?
Any advice on this would be really helpful.
Thanks!
Related Posts with CMP convergence issue: getting coefficients but no SE, p-val etc.
Principal Component Analysis with 3000 variablesHi My dataset consists of daily Google search volume indices (SVI) for around 3000 firms from 2004 …
convert excels files to .dta filesHello, I need to convert some excel files to .dta files. I used the following command: xls2dta, sa…
R-squared rockets when adding a categorical vairable in the Random Effect modelDear readers of Statalist, I have an unbalanced panel data of companies in a country and their corr…
Macro expansion in a while loopI'm having a little trouble with macro expansion inside a while loop. As a toy example, the followin…
contrast doesn't workHello everybody, I tried to use contrast in order to see if I should use some categorical variables…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to CMP convergence issue: getting coefficients but no SE, p-val etc.
Post a Comment