Hello,
We are estimating a model with binary Y and binary X, using the CMP command. In our main analysis, everything works perfectly.
However, for running a placebo test, we then create a random dummy variable which we use in place of our X variable. On re-doing the CMP estimation, the model fails to converge. The iterations continue to be concave. When we use the "nonrtol" option, it outputs a result (although it stays concave). However, we only get the coefficient but the standard errors, p-values, confidence intervals are all missing. We are also able to estimate margins of this random X variable after that. But is this interpretable? What is this nonrtol option doing such that we get a result?
Any advice on this would be really helpful.
Thanks!
Related Posts with CMP convergence issue: getting coefficients but no SE, p-val etc.
Splitting up survival analyses by follow-up timeHi all, I have a dataset I am analysing using survival analyses, with multiple records per patient.…
Creating local (or global) macro of past date (or range), in DDNNCCYY formatHi, I am trying to save a date range as a macro. I have it working to a degree with: Code: su dat…
reghdfe, clustering and crit. values -> adjusted?Dear all, I am using reghdfe and have few clusters. Throughout, I Wild-Cluster bottstrap my p-value…
Combining/Merging Duplicate ObservationsHi all, I have a dataset containing over 300'000 observations and have identified a few (1'725) dupl…
Multiple imputations: Predicting missing for selected categoriesHi I'm currently trying to use multiple imputation for a register based cohort analysis on maternal…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to CMP convergence issue: getting coefficients but no SE, p-val etc.
Post a Comment