I am in the process of running two different xtabond2 models, and have a question regarding the specification of “small T large N”. Our first model has 1880 employees over 9 years (T=9, N =1880, or around 4800 observations, total). Our second model has 1880 employees over 342 time periods (so T=342, N=1880, or around 100,000 observations, total).
I am wondering if there is a rule of thumb regarding what is meant by “small T large N”. If xtabond2 is not appropriate for the second model, can you recommend an alternate specification?
These employees belong to 32 firms and we intend to include firm fixed effects, in addition to time fixed effects in both models. Is the inclusion of firm fixed effects acceptable in the xtabond2 model?
Thanks for your help.
Related Posts with xtabond2 question on large N small T
Generate linear Probability, Logit and Probit Models using Stata 15 - New UserHello, I trust everybody is faring well. My name is Keiran, I am a new user of stata15. I have a que…
Scheme economist Code: set scheme economist for graphs puts the y axis and its label on the right hand side of the g…
Excel time- how to re-format in stata after xlsdta import?I've received 100 excel data files, which I have imported and appended to a single dta file by using…
Cutpoint Determination Methods in Survival AnalysisI am working on a project about predicting survival and recurrence from imaging-based biomarkers. In…
error occurred while loading iskoisei.ado r(199);After I updated the isko package today, no matter how many times I restart Stata the iskoisei didn't…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to xtabond2 question on large N small T
Post a Comment