I am in the process of running two different xtabond2 models, and have a question regarding the specification of “small T large N”. Our first model has 1880 employees over 9 years (T=9, N =1880, or around 4800 observations, total). Our second model has 1880 employees over 342 time periods (so T=342, N=1880, or around 100,000 observations, total).
I am wondering if there is a rule of thumb regarding what is meant by “small T large N”. If xtabond2 is not appropriate for the second model, can you recommend an alternate specification?
These employees belong to 32 firms and we intend to include firm fixed effects, in addition to time fixed effects in both models. Is the inclusion of firm fixed effects acceptable in the xtabond2 model?
Thanks for your help.
Related Posts with xtabond2 question on large N small T
macros in variable nameshi, suppose i have a variables named x1 x2 x3 ....x2000 and had set the following local macro and …
R Loop To get Survey Weighted Counts Code: input person status group angle weight 1 2 3 30 152 2 3 2 29 176 3 2 6 20 146 4 3 6 30 194 5…
Converting to a date from YMDHello everyone, I have a data set with the variable date in it and it looks like this Code: …
error obtaining scores for robust variance Code: mixed y cl.x##c.w age edu i.ind || id:cl.x, vce(robust) cov(exc) here is the data: https://…
Event Study on Panel dataI have a panel data set and I would like to conduct an event study. The variable dif shows the relat…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to xtabond2 question on large N small T
Post a Comment