I am in the process of running two different xtabond2 models, and have a question regarding the specification of “small T large N”. Our first model has 1880 employees over 9 years (T=9, N =1880, or around 4800 observations, total). Our second model has 1880 employees over 342 time periods (so T=342, N=1880, or around 100,000 observations, total).
I am wondering if there is a rule of thumb regarding what is meant by “small T large N”. If xtabond2 is not appropriate for the second model, can you recommend an alternate specification?
These employees belong to 32 firms and we intend to include firm fixed effects, in addition to time fixed effects in both models. Is the inclusion of firm fixed effects acceptable in the xtabond2 model?
Thanks for your help.
Related Posts with xtabond2 question on large N small T
Can I take fixed effects( such as country id) as a continues covariate to controlHi guys, I am using a cross-section data to run 2sls regression. And there is a bunch of dummies com…
How to plot these graphs?Dear all, I want to plot two graphs shown pictures below. I would appreciate if anyone can help me …
Using loop to create state-codes for statesHi, I have the following states. I want to assign a 2-digit code to each state. The dataex is given…
Help creating new variable using regression and fitted values, and creating a rolling average chartDear all, Hope all is well. Context: I am in the process of regressing director-turnover on the bo…
Egen with weights?Hello, I am new to Stata and I am trying to calculate the proportion of women in different regions …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to xtabond2 question on large N small T
Post a Comment