I have a cross-sectional dataset at the firm level, and my interest variable (RHS) is a country-level variable. The response variable (LHS) is firm performance (about 1000 firms in 50 countries). It seems I have to cluster the standard errors at the country-level. My question is whether there is no problem if the number of observations per cluster vary significantly? In other words, since I have some countries with only one firm and some other countries with more than 200 firms then can I still cluster at the country-level? Or, I must cluster at the bank-level (which is equivalent to robust standard errors, because of pure cross-section)?
Thank you,
Related Posts with Clustering standard errors
How to spread the reference's values to other observations at different yearsDear statalist, I have a dynamic panel for 20 years. However, data on one variable of interest is c…
Significant OLS results but insignificant IV results and the insignificant endogeneity testDear all, I want to explore the effects of X on Y. Considering X might be an exogenous variable, I …
Sargan-Hansen testHi. I am trying to obtain results for the Sargan-Hansen test. However, when I run a regression usin…
Create indicator variables from multiple response string variableHi, I have a multiple response string variable, locnm_1, which lists the names of local sponsors of…
Applying different colors to data points in scatter plotHi! I am trying to create a graph like the one below where I can apply different colors to data poin…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Clustering standard errors
Post a Comment