I am running a probit model to assess the determinants of private tutoring participation. One of the regressors I'm using is the teacher attendance ratio at school. The hypothesis is that higher teacher attendance should be correlated with lower tutoring.
My concern is regarding the interpretation of the coefficient of this variable. Naturally, in probit models, the coefficient itself doesn't have a meaning, and one needs to calculate the marginal effect. Should I use the dydx option with margins? What would be the interpretation of this variable which is measured as a ratio?
A similar question is posted here https://www.statalist.org/forums/for...tory-variables
However, it doesn't entirely resolve my doubt.
Related Posts with Interpreting a regressor in probit model
group data in a panel setDear Statalist, Here is a part of the sample data, which shows the gender of each employee in 3500 …
Error Component Random Parameter Logit Model with Correlated ErrorsHi everyone, I am trying to estimate an Error Component Random Parameter Logit Model with Correlated…
Generate random points from a given point coordinatesHi, I have a database of coordinates (lat, lon) and I would like to randomly generate a set of new …
Error Component Random Parameter Logit Model with Correlated Errors in STATA 16Hi everyone, I am trying to estimate an Error Component Random Parameter Logit Model with Correlated…
Am I correct with the tow step GMM syntax?Hello dear Stata users, I am doing research on working capital management and firm performance with…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpreting a regressor in probit model
Post a Comment