Dear All,
I am working on research to identify the influential factors of growth ambitions. I have a continuous dependent variable named growth aspirations which measure the number of jobs created in five years. This variable is right-skewed (12.3) so I would like to take the natural logarithm to be more normally distributed. However, most of the values take the value 0 which results in missing data if I transform it. Previous authors calculate entrepreneurs’ growth aspirations as the difference between (the natural logarithms of) the entrepreneurs expected number of employees in the next 5 years and the actual number of employees, exclusive of owners, at the firm’s inception. But if I take the log(Growthaspirations-actual numbers of employees) it also results in missing data as the difference takes a negative value. I have 90 thousand observations and 60-70% would be lost if I transform it to log. I am using the same database as those authors and their papers were published in highly recognized papers so I am sure they did the right thing.
Can anyone help me to solve this issue?
Thank you so much!
Related Posts with Coding my continous variable to natural logarithm
stset survival analysis error message: variable _d already definedHi StataList, I'm trying to use the stset command for survival analysis: Code: stset failure1_day…
stset with condition | Issue with codeWhat is wrong with my stset? I am excluding duplicates with the dupdrops variable for outcome analys…
Help understanding behavior of space in graph codeHello... I had a student run into a problem creating a graph when trying to apply a scheme...it wou…
Wrong parentheses for graph codeHi everyone, I intent to add my calculated confidence intervals to my graph: This is the code for …
Weak IV test after Xtabond2Dear all, I am running an xtabond2 model and I wanted to see whether the instruments are weak. For…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Coding my continous variable to natural logarithm
Post a Comment