Dear All,
I am new to stata and I am using Heckpoisson, a poison regression model with endogenous sample selection model to estimate factors influencing access to extension services and intensity of of access. I have the model result already but I have no clue of how to estimate the marginal effect (dydx) after Heckpoisson. I need you suggestion or help.
Below is the model output:
Poisson regression with endogenous selection Number of obs = 293
(25 quadrature point s) Selected = 141
Nonselected = 152
Wald chi2(9) = 39.34
Log pseudolikelihood = -397.3723 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robust
ext_freq | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
ext_freq |
age_hhh | -.0040843 .0034685 -1.18 0.239 -.0108824 .0027139
gender_hhh | -.2542102 .0785204 -2.82 0.005 -.3754374 -.067643
hh_size | -.0046676 .0156446 -0.30 0.765 -.0353305 .0259953
dist_mkt | .0075753 .013998 0.54 0.590 -.0198998 .0349712
own_cash_crop | .1196532 .0692318 1.73 0.084 -.0160386 .2553451
input_acces0 | .2543907 .0800315 3.05 0.002 .0870918 .4008095
aware_extension_services | -.2671813 .0863115 -3.15 0.002 -.4409838 -.1026488
access_2crdt | .07612 .0672013 1.14 0.253 -.0549509 .2084733
farm_size1 | .0021675 .0178802 0.15 0.881 -.032373 .0377159
_cons | 1.263667 .2010278 6.15 0.000 .8426601 1.630675
-------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
access_to_extension |
hh_size | -.051465 .031816 -1.62 0.106 -.1138233 .0108933
dist_mkt | -.0452002 .0317816 -1.42 0.155 -.107491 .0170905
own_cash_crop | -.0665395 .161095 -0.41 0.680 -.3822798 .2492008
input_acces0 | -.0579019 .1757906 -0.33 0.742 -.4024451 .2866414
aware_extension_services | .6452373 .1814888 3.56 0.000 .2895259 1.000949
access_2crdt | .3881123 .1606434 2.42 0.016 .0732571 .7029675
sell_rice | .3996281 .2191917 1.82 0.068 -.0299798 .8292361
farm_incom_hh | .0000456 .0000128 3.56 0.000 .0000205 .0000707
crop_dive | -.3390377 .3519390 -1.06 0.288 -.9650316 .2869562
main_inc_source | -.0995744 .1876322 -0.53 0.596 -.4673268 .268178
_cons | -.1595383 .4452855 -0.35 0.730 -1.026583 .7189037
-------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
/athrho | 1.515521 .248586 6.54 0.000 1.137901 2.11234
/lnsigma | -3.783098 .9520586 -4.03 0.000 -5.703099 -1.971098
-------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
rho | .9636253 .0322574 .8137061 .9711619
sigma | .0261155 .0222056 .0033356 .1393039
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wald test of indep. eqns. (rho = 0): chi2(1) = 33.01 Prob > chi2 = 0.0053
My regards,
T. Sumo
Related Posts with Marginal effect after heckpoisson
Using subpop reg to compare regression coefficients between groups.I am investigating how access to water and toilets in the household affects educational attainment i…
xtabond2 how to get the best result.Hello, This is my first time running a GMM model. Using below command; xtabond2 trisk l.trisk bind …
How to include several interaction terms within one syntaxHello Guys, I have a model in which variable m moderates 5 different independent variables (x1,x2,x…
Hierarchical ordered probit modelHi, I would love to estimate an hierarchical ordered probit model, but I have only found the comman…
Renaming an existing sheet in excel via xl() or putexcelHi im not sure if this is possible or not, but does anyone know if you can rename an existing sheet …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Marginal effect after heckpoisson
Post a Comment