Hello,
I am dealing with an intreg model, which does not meet the assumption of homoskedasticity. I ran a likelihood ratio test comparing the orginal model with an exponential model of heteroskedasticity. Therefore I added the het() option and included all independent variables in the het part. The likelihood ratio test confirms heteroscedasticity.
Now I wonder, whether I have to include all independent variables in the het option.
I noticed that if I leave out some of those variables which are not significant in the part below Insigma (in the model with the het option), it sometimes has an impact on whether my variable of interest is significant or not.
>Do I have to to include all independent variables in the het() option?
> If not, how can I determine which variables I have to add to the het option?
Many thanks in advance!
Kind regards
Anna
Related Posts with het() option - Which variables do I have to include?
Correlated RE Ordered Probit modeld: meaning of option i(pid)Dear Statalist users, I am estimating a Correlated RE Ordered Probit model in a panel context, whic…
Stata 16 undo redoHi all I am sorry but I have a basic issue: I just moved from a very old Stata version (Stata 11) to…
pweight and kernel densityHi all, I am trying to get kernel density graphs but i am unable to get these with adjustment of sa…
Random selection of observations in a variableHi, I have a dataset with 1500 each for 46 countries. But I want to make a random selection of coun…
xline codeDear Statalists, Hope you are all well. Is there any code to adjust the diagram (as shown below)? I…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to het() option - Which variables do I have to include?
Post a Comment