Hi,
I'm currently running regression models on cross-sectional data for which the outcome variables (I have two) are both clustered at zero. Of the 240 observations, around 100 are zero, while the others span from -60 to +40 for one dependent variable, and -2.5 to +2.5 (ordinal variable, iterations of 0.5) for the other dependent variable. Thus, the normality assumption is violated (as well as the homoskedasticity for one of the models). I will run both parametric tests (multiple regression) and nonparametric tests. To deal with the non-normality and heteroskedasticity, I've see suggestions to use vcs(robust) or vcs(bootstrap), or use rreg instead of reg. I'm not sure which to use, can anyone provide explanations of when to use which?
Thanks in advance,
Rens
Related Posts with Using rreg or vce(robust) for non-normal heteroscedastic standard errors
The modification of survey questions that are not replicated throughout years but have similar meaningDear members of Statalist, I am writing here regarding a dilemma that I have. I have a dataset from …
LR testHi everyone, I've run a logit regression on my panel data. The sigma and LR test results are: Wald c…
Get overview of my (unbalanced) panel dataHello everyone, I have to say at first that I'm far from being a Stata expert, but I have to use it…
Data query with odbc: from R to StataHi all! I just got access to a SQL Server, where there is a database storing a number of metrics, t…
Why im I getting a positive result with log-linear regression and a negative with linear-linear?Hi! I'm working on a project where I want to see the effect off an aviation tax on total passangers…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Using rreg or vce(robust) for non-normal heteroscedastic standard errors
Post a Comment