Dear All,
I am trying to calculate a wealth index using Principal Component Analysis. The quintiles derived from it are to be used as proxy for household socioeconomic status in a regression later.
I am using household income separately as an explanatory variable--my own reasoning being wealth and income are different ideas and it is also in accordance with the literature I am following.
Now, the variables for the index are all binary except for one ordinal categorical variable.
It is suggested that if only ordinal and nominal categorical data is used, multiple correspondence analysis is the apparent method.
However, I am using survey data, and while the user-written command -pca- accommodates for aweight, the other user-written -mca- does not.
What would be the best approach under these circumstances. Would going forward with -pca- be appropriate?
Related Posts with PCA vs MCA for index with survey weights
Coefficient of the interaction term of AFT modelDear Statalist, I have a question about the explanation of coefficients of interactions terms of the…
List of observations in regressionHello, I am running a regression in STATA (xtgee). xtgee Profit number_employees company_size , li…
page break between two tables generated by -esttab-?Dear all, Is there a way to add a page break between two tables when using -esttab-? I want my code…
Panel data: Multiple IDs, partly duplicatedI have received panel data that need lots of cleaning. The most substantial challenge is finding a u…
How to increase decimal in league table for network meta-analysisThe league table of network meta-analysis shows only two decimal. I try to increase decimal. Try to …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to PCA vs MCA for index with survey weights
Post a Comment