Hello,
I have panel data for 12 industries and 11 years (2006-2017). I want to choose whether I should use fixed effects or first differences - from what I have learnt if we have serially uncorrelated idiosyncratic errors in the original model, FE is better.
However, I was wondering: isn't this time period too small to rely on Durbin-Watson or Breusch-Godfrey test for lag(1)? It is annual data, so I though this could be the case. However, as i want to look for a change in variables over that time period, maybe I should use lag(10) instead?
Thank you.
Related Posts with serial correlation test: small t
Creating a combined graphHi, I'm struggling to get this right. I have 2 variables that I want to show on a single graph. Fir…
OLS vs FE vs RE? Tests results conflicts.Dear Stata specialists, Hope you can help me solve my problem. I recently run OLS, FE, RE for my p…
poisson regression (ppmlhdfe) with multiplicative errorIs there a way to force ppmlhdfe to use multiplicative error term instead of additive? I wan to run…
Constructing Gini Index for Household dataDear All I'm computing the Gini coefficient in Stata 16 with the" ineqdeco" command. I'm using panel…
estimating 5 year survivalHi, I have a dataset with survival months and event (dead/alive). I have been able to stset it and c…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to serial correlation test: small t
Post a Comment