Hello,
I have panel data for 12 industries and 11 years (2006-2017). I want to choose whether I should use fixed effects or first differences - from what I have learnt if we have serially uncorrelated idiosyncratic errors in the original model, FE is better.
However, I was wondering: isn't this time period too small to rely on Durbin-Watson or Breusch-Godfrey test for lag(1)? It is annual data, so I though this could be the case. However, as i want to look for a change in variables over that time period, maybe I should use lag(10) instead?
Thank you.
Related Posts with serial correlation test: small t
Reshaping long data with mtultiple categories into long dataStata 14.0 SE on Mac - Data contais 700,000 obervations Hi. I am trying to reshape a panel of US co…
command keep usingI am working on a replication and the author uses this Phrase: merge 1:1 pid syear using ".dta" kee…
indentify the latest year in pannel dataHi My sample includes firm survey in 10 countries. Each country may have more than one survey and t…
Help in understanding tfdiffDear all, I am trying to understand the tfdiff command before applying it to my data. To do so, I s…
Reducing the size of your database.Dear all, I am having troubles in "cleaning" my database, whose initial size is 22GBs (71 millions r…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to serial correlation test: small t
Post a Comment