Hello,
I have panel data for 12 industries and 11 years (2006-2017). I want to choose whether I should use fixed effects or first differences - from what I have learnt if we have serially uncorrelated idiosyncratic errors in the original model, FE is better.
However, I was wondering: isn't this time period too small to rely on Durbin-Watson or Breusch-Godfrey test for lag(1)? It is annual data, so I though this could be the case. However, as i want to look for a change in variables over that time period, maybe I should use lag(10) instead?
Thank you.
Related Posts with serial correlation test: small t
Issues running ranksum - says "no observations found"I'm relatively new to Stata so I am hoping that this error is a quick fix. I've been trying to run …
Non-linear regression with industry and year FEDear colleagues, Greetings! I have been searching different forums for the past weeks, but the mor…
Coding_column_rowDear statalist community, I am in need to do the following exercise for my research, can anyone plea…
Dropping specific addresses beginning with '#' or '$'Hello, I am trying to clean up a large dataset of addresses, where there are several different versi…
Poisson regression without specifying exit variableI am conducting an analysis using a longitudinal dataset from an ongoing cohort that spans over 5.5 …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to serial correlation test: small t
Post a Comment