Hello,
I have panel data for 12 industries and 11 years (2006-2017). I want to choose whether I should use fixed effects or first differences - from what I have learnt if we have serially uncorrelated idiosyncratic errors in the original model, FE is better.
However, I was wondering: isn't this time period too small to rely on Durbin-Watson or Breusch-Godfrey test for lag(1)? It is annual data, so I though this could be the case. However, as i want to look for a change in variables over that time period, maybe I should use lag(10) instead?
Thank you.
Related Posts with serial correlation test: small t
Logistic postestimation for survey dataHello, I want to do a logistic regression with survey data so I am using the svy prefix. How do I ge…
Estimating the gravity model using PPLM, general adviceHi, For my thesis I am intending to estimate a gravity model, looking at specifically the effect of…
Merging and grouping observations by industryHello, I have two datasets which are related, in the first one i have "all types of capital net (so…
STATA has started crashing when using the "Browse" button to import CSV filesEssentially as the title describes, STATA has just started crashing when I use the "Browse" button t…
Searching 1) for user written commands and 2) searching my .do filesHello I have 2 questions about searching in Stata 1) which is the best way to search the user/commun…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to serial correlation test: small t
Post a Comment