There are a bunch of datasets, e.g. world values survey, alcohol usage report etc which present good amounts of data over long periods of time.
However, these aren't really panel datasets (In some cases, they can't be, e.g. many ageing reports) - i.e. the entities surveyed aren't the same over the various "waves".
So typical longitudinal models such as fixed effects don't make sense.
In such cases, are pooled cross sections the best way to analyze the data in terms of relationship between variables, and if so, what sort of causality can be claimed, assuming each wave grabbed random, representative samples....
Related Posts with Pooled cross section the best way to analyze non-panel longitudinal data?
Matching observations in a quasi-random processDear Statalisters, I want to create a set of observations which is used to test different models la…
Relabel using grc1legI am trying to show 4 different graph plots in one same illustration. I am using the command grc1leg…
Spatgsa - dimension of the matrix vs number of observationsDear Statalist members, I have an identical problem as the one previously published in the forum: h…
Should I add age^2 when working with panel data or not?Hi all, I am analyzing the effect of marital status on life satisfaction for a period of 32 years o…
Running Two Limit Tobit modelHello, I have been attempting to run a Two Limit Tobit model on my data. I have a relatively large d…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Pooled cross section the best way to analyze non-panel longitudinal data?
Post a Comment