Why does the result of 'ci proportions x' depend on the format of variable x? Very strange. Using version 15. See below:
. describe x
storage display value
variable name type format label variable label
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
x byte %8.0f Example variable
. tab x, missing
Example |
variable | Freq. Percent Cum.
------------+-----------------------------------
0 | 86,913 98.73 98.73
1 | 1,119 1.27 100.00
------------+-----------------------------------
Total | 88,032 100.00
. ci proportions x
-- Binomial Exact --
Variable | Obs Proportion Std. Err. [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------
x | 88,032 0 0 0 0
. format x %10.0g
. ci proportions x
-- Binomial Exact --
Variable | Obs Proportion Std. Err. [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------
x | 88,032 .0127113 .0003776 .0119817 .0134733
Related Posts with Output of 'ci proportions' depends on variable format
Creating forward values in cross-sectional dataDear Stata-Listers, I have the feeling that the solution is quite easy. However, I just can't figur…
Conflicting Output for RDDHello everyone, I'm using rdrobust package. Array This is my output from RDD by indep var is signi…
Using time fixed and firm fixed effects separatelyHello, I've been following this forum for a while now and I have a question about my panel regressi…
Summarized do files: data managementDear all, Can anyone of you share some summarized do files, containing the widely used codes related…
PMG and ResidualsHi Everyone, I wonder how to calculate the Residuals for the Pool Mean Group (PMG) effect??? Regar…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Output of 'ci proportions' depends on variable format
Post a Comment