as has been discussed in this Forum in the past, the ASA previously issued a statement attempting to, at least, downplay the use of p-values; one criticism of their statement is that it was very weak (being kind here) on what to do instead
a new issue, I think completely open, of The American Statistician has just been released with a number of "ideas"; I have not read the full set of 43 papers (!) yet; at any rate, one might want to start with the editorial which in 19 pages attempts to summarize the issue and the accompanying papers; here is the url: https://tandfonline.com/toc/utas20/current?nav=tocList
Related Posts with new ASA "statement" re: p-values
Inconsistency between odds ratios and marginals in growth curve modelHi all, I am attempting to study the gender gap in the life-course evolution of political interest u…
Using joinby to combine monthly and yearly panel datasetsHi everybody I have a quick (maby redundant) question about joinby. I have many different panel dat…
KMATCH Matching Diagnostics Tests AvailabilityI started to work with the KMATCH command for propensity score matching and I am a bit struggling wi…
collect: Manipulate rows and columns?I am trying to learn Stata's -collect- and to manipulate tables. I find the manipulating part hard. …
New Variable for Average Value of First Half of ObservationsGood morning, I would like to generate a newvar that returns the average of the 'rating' variable, …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to new ASA "statement" re: p-values
Post a Comment