as has been discussed in this Forum in the past, the ASA previously issued a statement attempting to, at least, downplay the use of p-values; one criticism of their statement is that it was very weak (being kind here) on what to do instead
a new issue, I think completely open, of The American Statistician has just been released with a number of "ideas"; I have not read the full set of 43 papers (!) yet; at any rate, one might want to start with the editorial which in 19 pages attempts to summarize the issue and the accompanying papers; here is the url: https://tandfonline.com/toc/utas20/current?nav=tocList
Related Posts with new ASA "statement" re: p-values
LoopHello fellow Stata users, I have a question regarding the forvalues loop, this is the first time I …
Meta proportionHi to everybody... after running the "metaprop" command if it is possible to write instead of "ES" "…
Help creating a bar graph over multiple variablesGreetings, When creating a graph bar and dividing it over a variable, I cant figure out a way to add…
Trouble working with %tc datesHello, I have a variable "EndDate" whose format is double yet displays as if it was %tc. I need to …
Working with Stata datesHello, I would like to create a variable, called "outcome", measured as a dummy indicator equal to …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to new ASA "statement" re: p-values
Post a Comment