as has been discussed in this Forum in the past, the ASA previously issued a statement attempting to, at least, downplay the use of p-values; one criticism of their statement is that it was very weak (being kind here) on what to do instead
a new issue, I think completely open, of The American Statistician has just been released with a number of "ideas"; I have not read the full set of 43 papers (!) yet; at any rate, one might want to start with the editorial which in 19 pages attempts to summarize the issue and the accompanying papers; here is the url: https://tandfonline.com/toc/utas20/current?nav=tocList
Related Posts with new ASA "statement" re: p-values
ignore this also! …
A question on using macro variableI am running several models and only wanted to export selected regression coefficients to excel. So …
ignore this! …
Testing code blocks Code: This is a test with 10 spaces between here> <and here. …
testing code blocks Code: This is a test with 10 spaces between here> <and here. If you copy the code …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to new ASA "statement" re: p-values
Post a Comment