as has been discussed in this Forum in the past, the ASA previously issued a statement attempting to, at least, downplay the use of p-values; one criticism of their statement is that it was very weak (being kind here) on what to do instead
a new issue, I think completely open, of The American Statistician has just been released with a number of "ideas"; I have not read the full set of 43 papers (!) yet; at any rate, one might want to start with the editorial which in 19 pages attempts to summarize the issue and the accompanying papers; here is the url: https://tandfonline.com/toc/utas20/current?nav=tocList
Related Posts with new ASA "statement" re: p-values
summary stats with yearsDear all, do you know if there is a quick and easy way to produce summary stats with a column conta…
Order Coefficients in coefplotHi all, I am trying to produce a coefplot, and for some reason, the baseline year is showing up fir…
Transposing selected observations from the same datasetHello, I want to change the layout of my dataset for only SOME observations (from long to wide). Not…
Distribution of gender within subgroups of a groupHi! I want to do demographics on my data. I have an outcome variable called hypertension (0/1). If …
Difference in Difference model with panel data Dear, I have some questions about the difference-in-differences (DID) model with fixed effects. I …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to new ASA "statement" re: p-values
Post a Comment