This sounds very dumb actually. But I tried to control for treatment type (T1, T2, and T3) in the regression results below, and all of them are omitted due to collinearity. Actually, there are four treatment types: T1, T2, T3, and CONTROL. I left out CONTROL as a base for comparison.
Having said that, is there a way to figure out why this is happening? I know this is difficult without actually looking at the data though.
Thanks!
Array
Related Posts with Finding out the reason for collinearity
Creating matched-adjusted performance measuresHi everyone, I am new to this forum and I'm hoping that someone can help me. I have a sample of fir…
Issue regarding bandwidth selection using rdrobust command-packageHi there! I am having issues determining the optimal data-driven bandwidth in a fuzzy RD design. I…
how to Graph Firms Size Distributions (FSD) pooling together all the years and a graph FSD for a certain yeari have a panel data including 350 firms over 10 years. Now I have the employee numbers, how can I ca…
The error 'option robust not allowed' in the "Oaxaca_rif" commandHi. I am going to use the "Oaxaca_rif" command. However, although I run the example in the help fil…
Dropping many variables if all observations contain a certain textDear All, I am having trouble with a command in Stata and no matter how much I researched beforehand…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Finding out the reason for collinearity
Post a Comment