This sounds very dumb actually. But I tried to control for treatment type (T1, T2, and T3) in the regression results below, and all of them are omitted due to collinearity. Actually, there are four treatment types: T1, T2, T3, and CONTROL. I left out CONTROL as a base for comparison.
Having said that, is there a way to figure out why this is happening? I know this is difficult without actually looking at the data though.
Thanks!
Array
Related Posts with Finding out the reason for collinearity
Generate difference variable between 2 digits sectors and relevant 3 digits sub-sectors of NACE Rev.2Dear all, I have a data set consisting of Inflation rates relating to 2-,and 3- digit sectors of Na…
The critical thinking about the "staying forever" in Difference-in-Differences estimator of differential timing setting?When dealing with the differential timing DiD setting, we may apply some modern approaches like Call…
Response surface analysis (RSA)Hi! Does STATA support RSA analysis and the surface plotting? …
Screeplot of eigenvalues from the reduced correlation matrixI assume that STATA's screeplot command prints the eigenvalues from the sample correlation matrix. H…
Unexpected behavior of the egen function median()Hello all, This is my first post but I've read up on the FAQ so I hope it will be acceptable. To gi…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Finding out the reason for collinearity
Post a Comment