Dear Statalisters,
I've two questions about the weighting matrix in two-step GMM. Theoretically the number of instruments relative to the groups, when big, will cause the non-singularity of the weighting matrix. The first question is: Why even diminishing the number of instruments the stata's warning about the singularity continues to appear? and the second is: Is it better in a case like that to utilise the one-step procedure or the Windmeijer correction is suficcient?
Thanks.
Related Posts with About the 2-Step weighting matrix
Creating a study site map in stataHello Statalisters, I would like to find out if it is possible to generate a country map showing a …
Tag observations occuring within a time frameHi, I'm working with diagnostic labdata and I'd like to count how many times a person has been test…
Is there a way to get overall effects for a KHB decomposition when I have a categorical key variable?Dear all, I am currently running a KHB mediation analysis with a continuous DV (cognitive developmen…
Update to heatplot available from SSCA bugfix for heatplot is now available from the SSC Archive. Binning of x and y was erroneous at the…
Heterogenous Treatment EffectsHello, I have a question regarding heterogenous treatment effects. First I have estimated the propen…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to About the 2-Step weighting matrix
Post a Comment