Paper link: <https://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/.../200114pap.pdf>
I have some questions on this paper, as Rigobon and Sack's writings were rather abstract as for the estimation of the beta coefficient.
On page 11, is the beta coefficient being directly estimated by plugging in constant variances? or variances are also changing in the equation?
I have tried to put the estimates from the table II on the paper, but with the assumption of constant changes in variances and covariances, I am not getting the beta estimate found by Rigobon and Sack. My beta coefficient was 0.16 whereas the coefficient on the paper was estimated to be 0.21. Anyone care to explain what is happening there? Thank you.
Related Posts with Rigobon and Sack 2003 "Measuring the reaction of monetary policy to the stock market" - Replicate
MI Impute ErrorHi Statalisters, I've encountered a problem with a MI impute code. The mIssing data table is below:…
Diff-in-Diff policy analysis: supress intercept to obtain policy effect?Dear Statalists, I am currently writing my ba thesis on the effectivness of Environmental Policy usi…
Generate a group if an ID starts with an AHi all, I am trying to generate a group=1 if an ID starts with a certain letter/number. Do you have…
Stata seems to override memory limits and take up the entire memoryI am using package synth. If run for long, synth progressively consumes all available RAM. It is not…
How to add the groups used in a regression to outreg2 export table?Dear all, I am using a panel dataset with 217 countries for the years 1960-2019 for LPM/OLS regress…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Rigobon and Sack 2003 "Measuring the reaction of monetary policy to the stock market" - Replicate
Post a Comment