Paper link: <https://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/.../200114pap.pdf>
I have some questions on this paper, as Rigobon and Sack's writings were rather abstract as for the estimation of the beta coefficient.
On page 11, is the beta coefficient being directly estimated by plugging in constant variances? or variances are also changing in the equation?
I have tried to put the estimates from the table II on the paper, but with the assumption of constant changes in variances and covariances, I am not getting the beta estimate found by Rigobon and Sack. My beta coefficient was 0.16 whereas the coefficient on the paper was estimated to be 0.21. Anyone care to explain what is happening there? Thank you.
Related Posts with Rigobon and Sack 2003 "Measuring the reaction of monetary policy to the stock market" - Replicate
Summary stat. to excelDear All, I would like to export my results to an excel sheet. I tried this code below but it did n…
Question on bar graph (percentages of answer options) by group for more than 3 variablesHi all I am fairly new to Stata and the forum, I hope the way I described my problem is ok! Thank …
Selectively dropping 1 of 2 similar variables measured on the same dateData cleaning question: I have a longitudinal data set from 2009 to 2020 involving children and adol…
Help with small sample panel data with cross-sectional dependenceI'm using the CCE estimation technique for a research work. My dataset consists of eight cross-secti…
Event History Analysis vs. LogitI have a conundrum regarding a policy analysis I'm running. I have a variable stateorder that is cod…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Rigobon and Sack 2003 "Measuring the reaction of monetary policy to the stock market" - Replicate
Post a Comment