Hello all! I am running a few checks using the new heterogeneity-robust diff-in-diff estimators, specifically: csdid, did_imputation, and did_muliplegt. From each estimator, I retrieve the estimates for the leads and lags relative to the time of policy introduction and compare to the lead/lag estimates from a standard event study model (using reghdfe). It seems that these estimators by default choose the reference period as the latest lead, as opposed to the lead at period -1 right before policy introduction. This may be innocuous with simulated data but it creates problems when one tries to estimate the overall average ATT (all lag/lead estimates will be relative to the wrong period). I've seen this issue with simulated data (e.g. Asjad Naqvi 's incredibly helpful code: https://asjadnaqvi.github.io/DiD/docs/code/06_combined/) and with real data across different projects.
I was wondering if anyone has figured out how to somehow force the reference lead to be period -1 or otherwise re-scaled the lead and lag estimates to be relative to this more meaningful reference.
Thanks for chiming in!
P.S. This could be a very simple fix and I am just completely missing it!
Related Posts with Reference period in new DID estimators
Code to be able identify treated-control firm(s) groups for matched dataHi I have a matched treated-control firm-year panel dataset which I matched on different variables …
Create a new variable that shows the result of tabulationHello Statalist, I consider myself a beginner, so I would appreciate your help, and thank you for t…
Question about time series data with multiple factorsI am trying to format my data to allow me to designate it as time series and use the lag and lead op…
significance of difference in coefficients of same regression modelHi, I am having a question regarding testing whether the difference of coefficients is significant.…
Interrupted time series with multiple treatment periodsI am working on a sugar tax evaluation, using an interrupted time series model that accounts for two…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Reference period in new DID estimators
Post a Comment