Dear All,
I hope someone following Stata for many years can help me with remembering: there used to be a problem (and I hope I can recollect correctly) where a method was introduced and then later withdrawn by the StataCorp. Here is what I remember, any or all of the below may be wrong:
- it was related to calculation of standard errors or confidence intervals;
- with survey data
- probably introduced in version 8 and recalled (disabled) in version 9, or in the 9 to 10 transition, but unlikely anything newer.
- could be survey proportion or survey ratio commands, or something similar.
- could be https://www.stata.com/statalist/arch.../msg00126.html , but I somehow remember this regarding the SVY subset of commands.
I believe this was mentioned earlier in the Statalist, but googling now didn't result in any mentioning of that problem.
If anyone can point to more details, please do.
Much appreciated, Sergiy Radyakin
Related Posts with Old bug
Is there any difference in endogeneity test when i have two endogeneous variables?Dear Statalist, I have a panel dataset of 10,000 households * 3 years. And based on the two-way fix…
The odds ratio, SD, CI is too small?Hello, I am doing a logistic to check the odds ratio between binary outcome and continuous variable…
Testing for Interaction, C.Logistic Regression: Colinearity and no observations identifiedHello, I am trying to assess for interaction where the primary association is estrogen use and endo…
Why do we estimate and report unadjusted regression results besides adjusted?Hi All, I hope you are well! I am wondering why do we have to estimate and report unadjusted regres…
Adaptive lasso with fixed lambdaDear all, I am trying to run an adaptive Lasso where I want to input my choice of the penalty param…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Old bug
Post a Comment