Hi everyone, I am new to the forum.
My original paper shows that " *, ** and *** denote significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1%, respectively."
But when I run the regression, the result shows that "t statistics in parentheses * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001". It looks to me that " *, ** and *** denote significance at the 5%, 1%, and 0.1%, respectively."
I am wondering my explanation is falling into any fallacy. If my explanation is right, so how should I do in STATA to adjust the output that they can show the results of
" *, **, and *** denote significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1%, respectively."
Warm regards.
Related Posts with Setting significant levels and explanation
Meta-Analysis - how to compare 2 Effects: "The effect of A on C is stronger than the effect of B on C."Dear Stata Professionals, i have a question on a meta-analysis problem. I have 38 studies on which…
Error when producing graph using pbalchkHello, I am trying to use the user written command pbalchk to check balance after IPW. ely_dly is m…
Overlay Dot ChartsHello! I have a relatively simple question that I have searched the forum for but could use extra a…
Reshape large panel data set with multiple variables and daily dataHi members, I have a large data set with information about 166 bonds, their characteristics, follow…
Flag id's that have a tag==0I have a maternity dataset, where each mother has a record per pregnancy. I want to do two things: 1…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Setting significant levels and explanation
Post a Comment