Hi everyone, I am new to the forum.
My original paper shows that " *, ** and *** denote significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1%, respectively."
But when I run the regression, the result shows that "t statistics in parentheses * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001". It looks to me that " *, ** and *** denote significance at the 5%, 1%, and 0.1%, respectively."
I am wondering my explanation is falling into any fallacy. If my explanation is right, so how should I do in STATA to adjust the output that they can show the results of
" *, **, and *** denote significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1%, respectively."
Warm regards.
Related Posts with Setting significant levels and explanation
Spatial Panel analysis for SYS-GMMHello, I have a problem. I have my model SYS_GMM (level e diff) done by using xtabond2 of Arellano a…
Coupled forestplotDear Stata user, I could create one with the midas command using the following code: midas tp fp fn …
Import Excel Loop issuesHello everyone, I'm trying to write code to import certain worksheets from an excel workbook, but I …
Adding 'proportion' to esttab command.Dear All, I am estimating a logistic fixed effects regression to estimate the effect of a policy ch…
Equivalent of 'exposure' variable for xtlogit regression for diff-in-diffDear All, I am running a logistic FE regression to estimate a the effect of a 'treatment' using a g…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Setting significant levels and explanation
Post a Comment