Hi everyone, I am new to the forum.
My original paper shows that " *, ** and *** denote significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1%, respectively."
But when I run the regression, the result shows that "t statistics in parentheses * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001". It looks to me that " *, ** and *** denote significance at the 5%, 1%, and 0.1%, respectively."
I am wondering my explanation is falling into any fallacy. If my explanation is right, so how should I do in STATA to adjust the output that they can show the results of
" *, **, and *** denote significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1%, respectively."
Warm regards.
Related Posts with Setting significant levels and explanation
Semiparametric Difference-in-DifferencesHi Any suggestions on how to implement Semiparametric DID for repeated cross-section datasets? STA…
How to amalgamate multiple observations for a single patients into one observationHi, I am sure this problem has been discussed before, but I just cannot find the solution to my prob…
Creating an indicator variable using the cond() functionI would like to categorise a variable into seven categories based on specific definitions. The categ…
reshaping a dataset for a discrete choice model/conditional logit?Hey folks. I have data from a survey in which I ask each respondent to complete two discrete choice …
xttest2 errorHello Everyone, I am very new to this forum. Can someone help me understand what is meant by "id con…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Setting significant levels and explanation
Post a Comment