I am looking at the effect of sport participation on happiness. Happiness is my dependent variable, between integers 1 to 10, and sport participation is my independent variable which is binary; I also have controls commonly used in happiness economics (age, marital status, work etc). I wanted to use an instrumental variable approach in order to limit endogeneity concerns and I have a relevant instrument: a binary variable on whether sports facilities existed in close proximity to the respondent.
Using a two step instrumental variable approach yielded consistent, statistically significant results. However, when using ivregress or ivreg2, using the same instrument, the resulting standard error on my sport participation variable is huge (~1.2, which is over 10x that of any other variables) and the p value is now 0.6. What could be the reasons for this and is there a way to resolve this?
Furthermore, are there any other models which would be useful to employ and applicable for my data and how would I go about applying them?
Many thanks!
Related Posts with Problem with instrumental variable regression
FGLS regression helpHello Stata experts. Kindly need your expertise in doing an FGLS regression in panel data. I have da…
Nested regression with string variablesDear all, I hope you can help me. I've been trying and trying on my own to find a solution to this p…
Heckman two stage procedureHello, I want to use the Heckman Two Stage Procedure, but I don't understand why the selection equat…
Export structure changes after forming any free trade agreements: looking into developing countriesHii, this is just a preliminary analysis before performing a PPML estimation based on gravity equati…
Implementing Lee Bounds in STATAHi everyone, I am using data from a randomized controlled trial to estimate lee bounds since I have…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Problem with instrumental variable regression
Post a Comment