Dear all,
I have a question that is probably specific to meta regression analyses.
I refer to Feld & Heckemeyer (2011) who are presenting in Figure 2 two models as follows:
(1) Array
(2) Array
(1) is here the fixed effects model and (2) the mixed or random effects model.
My question here is probably simple for most of you: When I chose my moderators, is it correct to regress (1) with -areg- and (2) with -reg-? If not, would you have any suggestion for a better approach?
Thanks in advance and best regards
Related Posts with Meta regression: Random and Fixed effects / reg and areg
Unit-root test for a bounded seriesHi All, I would like to test for unit root for a series that is bounded, i.e., a series which lies …
Group IDs for observation-specific date range and a dummyHi, I have data on project teams for a number of different companies. Included in the data is a DAT…
Westerlund cointegration testI am attempting to estimate a panel co-integration. I converted 'country' to numeric using encode co…
using xtreg for decompositionHello, We have the following dataset: A limited panel in which an establishment is found in the sam…
Structural Break Tests with an unknown date - Ambiguous information given in STATA output.Hello, I am running a structural break test with an unknown data (command in STATA: estat sbsingle)…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Meta regression: Random and Fixed effects / reg and areg
Post a Comment