Dear all,
I have a question that is probably specific to meta regression analyses.
I refer to Feld & Heckemeyer (2011) who are presenting in Figure 2 two models as follows:
(1) Array
(2) Array
(1) is here the fixed effects model and (2) the mixed or random effects model.
My question here is probably simple for most of you: When I chose my moderators, is it correct to regress (1) with -areg- and (2) with -reg-? If not, would you have any suggestion for a better approach?
Thanks in advance and best regards
Related Posts with Meta regression: Random and Fixed effects / reg and areg
estimating sample size for cohort studiesI am trying to compute the sample size of a cohort study, pregnant women beyond 20 weeks of gestatio…
Counting up within IDHi everyone, Quick question that may be quite simple to answer but I am having trouble wrapping my …
How to organise my data, Im a beginner!Hi I would like to know what commands to use to organise my data, I currently have a dataset with ov…
Producting publication tables for loneway commandDear Stata users, I computed different intraclass correlations using the loneway command. Which comm…
standard deviation of a variableHi everyone, I have a set data for 10 years. I want to calculate the standard deviation of one varia…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Meta regression: Random and Fixed effects / reg and areg
Post a Comment