Dear all,
I have a question that is probably specific to meta regression analyses.
I refer to Feld & Heckemeyer (2011) who are presenting in Figure 2 two models as follows:
(1) Array
(2) Array
(1) is here the fixed effects model and (2) the mixed or random effects model.
My question here is probably simple for most of you: When I chose my moderators, is it correct to regress (1) with -areg- and (2) with -reg-? If not, would you have any suggestion for a better approach?
Thanks in advance and best regards
Related Posts with Meta regression: Random and Fixed effects / reg and areg
Generating sequence of observations.Hi, I have the "have" variable and based on that "have" variable, I want to generate the two variabl…
NA's in sureg()Hi, How are NAs in the dependent variable column dealt for in sureg()? I want to estimate a system …
How to generate the column before a columnSorry if this has been asked before I have dataset containing var1 and var2. I want to generate a ne…
r(198) invalid varnameHello , I do not know why stata tell me "r(198)invalid varname. " I check it for several times. I ho…
Marginal effects at representative valuesDear all, I am working with Stata's margins command and have some difficulties to interpret the mea…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Meta regression: Random and Fixed effects / reg and areg
Post a Comment