Dear all,
I have a question that is probably specific to meta regression analyses.
I refer to Feld & Heckemeyer (2011) who are presenting in Figure 2 two models as follows:
(1) Array
(2) Array
(1) is here the fixed effects model and (2) the mixed or random effects model.
My question here is probably simple for most of you: When I chose my moderators, is it correct to regress (1) with -areg- and (2) with -reg-? If not, would you have any suggestion for a better approach?
Thanks in advance and best regards
Related Posts with Meta regression: Random and Fixed effects / reg and areg
Reshape data to create a stacked horizontal bar-graph, such as catplot from ssc, for several variablesDear all, First of all, I am really sorry this post is so long winded. I was not sure how much info…
Encode command with conditionsHi, I have a question about the "encode" command. my data is as below. I need to use the "cluster" …
Code for ownership concentration - with foreach loops?Dear all, I am new to STATA and tried to calculate a measure that captures the ownership concentrat…
Fixed effects corner solution response model (Tobit)Dear Statalist community, I would like to request your help for implementation of a specific econom…
How to compute average of two values within the same cell?Hi I have a variable named age_range (with storage type: str5) as you can see in the following tabl…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Meta regression: Random and Fixed effects / reg and areg
Post a Comment