Dear all,
I have two relatively small Data sets (N=76 and N=111) and I use a WLS approach with aweights using the standard errors, since it is a meta regression. I follow the UCLA regression diagnostics (https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/stata/we...n-diagnostics/) and nearly everything works fine.
In the end, -ovtest- shows a p-value of 0,0139 which indicates a rejection of H0. Additionaly, I have some leverage points that exceed the value that is calculated as by UCLA: (2k+2)/n with k=#predictors. My value is 0.24, the highest leverage points are arround 0.70. Can the result of -ovtest- be due to those leverage points or the sample size? As far as I know, the -ovtest- should not have a problem with small sample sizes, but maybe there is something that I did not see. Is such a result by -ovtest- a big problem? Unfortunately, I do not have the biggest experience in applied econometrics. I would be very grateful for any remarks.
Best regards
Janik
Related Posts with Diagnostics: Power of ovtest and leverage points
Analyzing individual quiz scores with group quiz scoresDear Statlist experts, I have a data set of the performance of graduate course participants (n=30).…
Constructing panel data setHi I am trying to construct a panel dataset comprised of yearly observations of import values for d…
Calculating stable ratios in given time period for given firms in panel data setHi, I have a panel data set containing choosen financial data for thousands of companies. Some compa…
The perpetual inventory method (PIM)Hi dear Statalists, Is there any specialist who can help me to translate this statement into Stata …
Extracting the first number from a variable nameHello, I have data that looks like the following Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. For more …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Diagnostics: Power of ovtest and leverage points
Post a Comment