Dear all,
I have two relatively small Data sets (N=76 and N=111) and I use a WLS approach with aweights using the standard errors, since it is a meta regression. I follow the UCLA regression diagnostics (https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/stata/we...n-diagnostics/) and nearly everything works fine.
In the end, -ovtest- shows a p-value of 0,0139 which indicates a rejection of H0. Additionaly, I have some leverage points that exceed the value that is calculated as by UCLA: (2k+2)/n with k=#predictors. My value is 0.24, the highest leverage points are arround 0.70. Can the result of -ovtest- be due to those leverage points or the sample size? As far as I know, the -ovtest- should not have a problem with small sample sizes, but maybe there is something that I did not see. Is such a result by -ovtest- a big problem? Unfortunately, I do not have the biggest experience in applied econometrics. I would be very grateful for any remarks.
Best regards
Janik
Related Posts with Diagnostics: Power of ovtest and leverage points
From single event observations to time seriesHi everyone, As I am quite new to Stata hope you can help me out with the next question. Currently…
Substracting different rows in StataHi all! I need your help, please! I have data from 2014q1 to 2019q4, what I want to do is subtract …
How do I generate a risk score and then use it to calculate quartile odds ratioHello I was looking for some assistance in generating a prediction risk score for a binary outcome …
How to rewrite graph-like command that written by users under Stata 6.0 or earlierDear Stata users, Stata had changed its graph command since version 7. However there are a lot of c…
error message returned when installing spost13 using Stata 17Hello, I would like to use Brant test for my ordered logistic regression models and tried to instal…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Diagnostics: Power of ovtest and leverage points
Post a Comment