Hi,
I run a conditional logistic model.
Dependent Variable: Financial status (a binary variable),
Dependent Variables: Financial ratios, Corporate Governance Variables
The reviewer suggested checking the endogeneity issue between the dependent variable and corporate governance variables. For that, I choose one variable, board size as an instrument variable, which has the least correlation with the financial distress. Multiplied it with the % independence to get a number of independent board members.
correl bsize status
g number_ind_board_mem = bsize*bind
correl bsize status number_ind_board_mem
ivprobit status sta wcta tlta dual ins aind cind nind (number_ind_board_mem = bsize), twostep
Is there any test to ensure the validity and reliability of the chosen instrument, except correlation?
Regards,
Sumaira
Here are the results:
. correl bsize status
(obs=1,336)
bsize status
bsize 1.0000
status -0.0182 1.0000
. g number_ind_board_mem = bsize*bind
. correl bsize status number_ind_board_mem
(obs=1,336)
bsize status number~m
bsize 1.0000
status -0.0182 1.0000
number_ind~m 0.6164 -0.0680 1.0000
.
. ivprobit status sta wcta tlta dual ins aind cind nind (number_ind_board_mem =
> bsize), twostep
Checking reduced-form model...
Two-step probit with endogenous regressors Number of obs = 1,336
Wald chi2(9) = 156.85
Prob > chi2 = 0.0000
Coef. Std. Err. z P>z [95% Conf. Interval]
number_ind_b~m -.0013245 .0004092 -3.24 0.001 -.0021265 -.0005225
sta -.1339088 .0417514 -3.21 0.001 -.21574 -.0520777
wcta -2.155826 .2275308 -9.47 0.000 -2.601778 -1.709874
tlta -.1369385 .2056887 -0.67 0.506 -.540081 .266204
dual -.6820512 .1706843 -4.00 0.000 -1.016586 -.347516
ins -.0065843 .0014534 -4.53 0.000 -.0094328 -.0037357
aind -.0010084 .0050894 -0.20 0.843 -.0109834 .0089666
cind .0002136 .0034307 0.06 0.950 -.0065104 .0069377
nind -.0057245 .0025953 -2.21 0.027 -.0108112 -.0006378
_cons 2.34557 .4646972 5.05 0.000 1.43478 3.25636
Instrumented: number_ind_board_mem
Instruments: sta wcta tlta dual ins aind cind nind bsize
Wald test of exogeneity: chi2(1) = 0.72 Prob > chi2 = 0.3974
Related Posts with Validity and Reliability of Instrumental Variable
Creating new variable from other variablesHello; I am trying to merge some variables to create a new variable. To expand, I am trying to cre…
Collapse command, OLS regression, and weighing per groupHello everyone, I am analyzing a large dataset with STATA, and am utilizing OLS regression to try t…
What is the meaning of this Stata code and how to fix errors?Dear all, I come across a replication do-file of a study and some code in the do-file are beyond my…
Creating new variable from other variablesHello; I am trying to merge some variables to create a new variable. To expand, I am trying to cre…
Why after exporting a table to the Word document, the headers of the table are dislocated?Hi, I've run the following syntax but as you can see in the attached the headers of the table are di…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Validity and Reliability of Instrumental Variable
Post a Comment