Hi,
I run a conditional logistic model.
Dependent Variable: Financial status (a binary variable),
Dependent Variables: Financial ratios, Corporate Governance Variables
The reviewer suggested checking the endogeneity issue between the dependent variable and corporate governance variables. For that, I choose one variable, board size as an instrument variable, which has the least correlation with the financial distress. Multiplied it with the % independence to get a number of independent board members.
correl bsize status
g number_ind_board_mem = bsize*bind
correl bsize status number_ind_board_mem
ivprobit status sta wcta tlta dual ins aind cind nind (number_ind_board_mem = bsize), twostep
Is there any test to ensure the validity and reliability of the chosen instrument, except correlation?
Regards,
Sumaira
Here are the results:
. correl bsize status
(obs=1,336)
bsize status
bsize 1.0000
status -0.0182 1.0000
. g number_ind_board_mem = bsize*bind
. correl bsize status number_ind_board_mem
(obs=1,336)
bsize status number~m
bsize 1.0000
status -0.0182 1.0000
number_ind~m 0.6164 -0.0680 1.0000
.
. ivprobit status sta wcta tlta dual ins aind cind nind (number_ind_board_mem =
> bsize), twostep
Checking reduced-form model...
Two-step probit with endogenous regressors Number of obs = 1,336
Wald chi2(9) = 156.85
Prob > chi2 = 0.0000
Coef. Std. Err. z P>z [95% Conf. Interval]
number_ind_b~m -.0013245 .0004092 -3.24 0.001 -.0021265 -.0005225
sta -.1339088 .0417514 -3.21 0.001 -.21574 -.0520777
wcta -2.155826 .2275308 -9.47 0.000 -2.601778 -1.709874
tlta -.1369385 .2056887 -0.67 0.506 -.540081 .266204
dual -.6820512 .1706843 -4.00 0.000 -1.016586 -.347516
ins -.0065843 .0014534 -4.53 0.000 -.0094328 -.0037357
aind -.0010084 .0050894 -0.20 0.843 -.0109834 .0089666
cind .0002136 .0034307 0.06 0.950 -.0065104 .0069377
nind -.0057245 .0025953 -2.21 0.027 -.0108112 -.0006378
_cons 2.34557 .4646972 5.05 0.000 1.43478 3.25636
Instrumented: number_ind_board_mem
Instruments: sta wcta tlta dual ins aind cind nind bsize
Wald test of exogeneity: chi2(1) = 0.72 Prob > chi2 = 0.3974
Related Posts with Validity and Reliability of Instrumental Variable
Help in dealing with messy longitudinal line graphGreetings, I'm running Stata 15.1 on OSX. Using data from the general social survey, I'm attempting…
xtabond2 Hansen testHello I'm using system GMM to estimate TFP growth (gtfp_100) at regional level . I've a problem with…
Problem with hausman testIm using stata 12 and I have a result like this Code: . hausman fe re ---- Coef…
Synth_runner: Interpret the statistical outcome and general questions [Stata]Hello together, I am started to work with stata and synth_runner package. I try to figure out differ…
Static (not dynamic) panel data using xtabond2.Dear All, This is a question more about econometric concept rather than Stata code. While (ssc insta…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Validity and Reliability of Instrumental Variable
Post a Comment