I have uncovered an interesting issue, and am curious if anybody has an explanation for what I am seeing.
I am running a repeated measures model with two time periods, one factor, and three continuous level covariates. For a number of reasons I have estimated these models in both SAS and Stata. Here is what is curious. For all of my within-subject effects, the SAS Type III SS and associated F-tests are identical to the Stata reported Partial SS. This is as expected -- all is fine.
The between-subject effects are, however, a different matter. While the SS associated with the factor variable is identical, and the residual SS is also an exact match, the SS attributed to the covariates differ considerably.
Has anybody else encountered this difference?
Thank you.
Related Posts with Stata vs. SAS Differences in Repeated Measures Anova
String Variable - Subinstr? Regex?Dear Statalist, I am in the process of cleaning a dataset, in particular standardizing a string vari…
date conversionA bit new to Stata. Wondered if someone could tell me how to convert a date variable from an externa…
Calculate maximum drawdown from asset returns (and not prices)Hi, I would like to calculate the maximum drawdown from asset returns (and not prices). The definit…
Clustering standard errorsI have a cross-sectional dataset at the firm level, and my interest variable (RHS) is a country-leve…
Error of sample contain multiple panels: Panel data with multiple identifiersI am attempting to obtain the autocorrelations and partial autocorrelations and to perform the Dicke…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Stata vs. SAS Differences in Repeated Measures Anova
Post a Comment