I have uncovered an interesting issue, and am curious if anybody has an explanation for what I am seeing.
I am running a repeated measures model with two time periods, one factor, and three continuous level covariates. For a number of reasons I have estimated these models in both SAS and Stata. Here is what is curious. For all of my within-subject effects, the SAS Type III SS and associated F-tests are identical to the Stata reported Partial SS. This is as expected -- all is fine.
The between-subject effects are, however, a different matter. While the SS associated with the factor variable is identical, and the residual SS is also an exact match, the SS attributed to the covariates differ considerably.
Has anybody else encountered this difference?
Thank you.
Related Posts with Stata vs. SAS Differences in Repeated Measures Anova
Building cross-lagged panel models with categorical variables on StataCan someone here suggest to me a suitable way to build a cross-lagged panel model with categorical v…
reshape or transpose?Dear All, I was asked this question here (https://bbs.pinggu.org/forum.php?mod...a=#pid74912031). Th…
Seasonality in annual data? Problem or not?Hello, I have a panel data at an annual frequency. When I use the xtline command to get the linear p…
using forvalues loop and postfile commandDear statalist i have a sample of only 3 observation, i having problem calculating outer product of …
Ranking the most important predictor variables from a series of regression models.Hi, I came across an interesting study that did the following: 'number of births in the last 5 yea…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Stata vs. SAS Differences in Repeated Measures Anova
Post a Comment