I have uncovered an interesting issue, and am curious if anybody has an explanation for what I am seeing.
I am running a repeated measures model with two time periods, one factor, and three continuous level covariates. For a number of reasons I have estimated these models in both SAS and Stata. Here is what is curious. For all of my within-subject effects, the SAS Type III SS and associated F-tests are identical to the Stata reported Partial SS. This is as expected -- all is fine.
The between-subject effects are, however, a different matter. While the SS associated with the factor variable is identical, and the residual SS is also an exact match, the SS attributed to the covariates differ considerably.
Has anybody else encountered this difference?
Thank you.
Related Posts with Stata vs. SAS Differences in Repeated Measures Anova
Bivariate Dynamic Probit Model for Panel DataHello All, I would like to estimate a Bivariate Dynamic Probit model for panel data using Simulated…
descriptive statistics and correlation of panel data from STATA to excelHi, I am trying to export a descriptive statistics of panel data from STATA to excel by using the f…
Command for division with ln Hello guys! I would like help to use a command in stata for the following formula that I use in exc…
Lag function using datesDear all May you assist since I am not very familiar with lag functions. I am working with longitud…
New variables using longitudinal dataMay you assist with syntax for longitudinal data. 1. Within each record "personid" I would like to …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Stata vs. SAS Differences in Repeated Measures Anova
Post a Comment