Hello Statalist-Forum,
I was wondering if you could help me with a problem:
I have a continous outcome variable (a health score) and information about incidents per governorate in a country. I want to describe the realtionship between those two (obviously adding more variables at another point).
My question: Do I include fixed governorate effects in this regression, eventhough it is on the exact same level (a dummy for all the governorates)? Additionally, do I cluster the SE?
Basic Code:
reg health incidents
1. alternative
reg health incidents i.governorate
2. alternative
reg health incidents i.governorate, vce(cluster gov)
Like I said, the information on the incidents are also on the governorate level (one number for each governorate).
It feels that this would create somewhat a problem or a circular thing. However I can not explain to myself econometrically if this really states a problem or if this is fine.
Thank a lot in advance
Related Posts with Clustered Errors and fixed effect on the same level
create a new variable from weighted variables?Hello everyone, I'm now stuck into this one: I have a data-set and a (sample) weight variable. Due …
Bilateral exchange rate data with and without make changes in overall results.Dear Statalist, I am using a bilateral exchange rate variable in the gravity model. However, when I…
xtline and standard deviationHello everyone, I need to draw a lineplot for paneldata. I used the following command: collapse (m…
Xtqreg-qunaitle regression in a panel dataDear Joao Santos Silva I am trying to run fixed effects quantile regression for a panel of 260 firm…
New on SSC - complexity : computes Complexity Indexes similar to ECI/PCIDear Statalisters, This post to announce that I've released complexity - a package to compute compl…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Clustered Errors and fixed effect on the same level
Post a Comment