Hi
The meta forestplot using random(ebayes) appears to produce a different value for the I2 result compared to the output for meta summarize using the same method. Using different methods (fixed dlaird etc) produces the same I2 in the meta summarize and forestplot but not when using random(ebayes).
Is the an issue with the meta forestplot?
Thanks
Related Posts with Different I-square results for meta summarize and meta forestplot using random empirical Bayes method
Is it possible to divide a variable by the mean across individuals for a regression???Hello, is it okay to divide each individual's value of a variable by the mean of the sample and the…
factor variables and time-series operators not allowedHi, I am trying to run the following the codes, but get the error message "factor variables and tim…
Three way tables using svysetHello, I am using Stata 13 and I have a question regarding three way tables while using complex sur…
Assigning variable values to observations based common values of other variables...I have a data set with 3 variables: one identifies the contract number; one identifies the type of c…
Merging datesHi, I'm trying to merge two dates variables from the same dataset, but I would like to prioritize o…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Different I-square results for meta summarize and meta forestplot using random empirical Bayes method
Post a Comment