Hi
The meta forestplot using random(ebayes) appears to produce a different value for the I2 result compared to the output for meta summarize using the same method. Using different methods (fixed dlaird etc) produces the same I2 in the meta summarize and forestplot but not when using random(ebayes).
Is the an issue with the meta forestplot?
Thanks
Related Posts with Different I-square results for meta summarize and meta forestplot using random empirical Bayes method
Help with Loop based on timeHi For the following dataset, I have generated the first month of the data for X2 and X3 but for re…
Covariances across groups and quarters Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input byte qrtr float(…
zoib regressionHi everyone, I have used the zero-one inflated beta regression but I have concerns. My dependent var…
labels of yDear All, I have this dataset Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex…
Mediation with quantile regressionDear all i hope you are doing well i'd like to ask you if there is a way to deal with mediation ef…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Different I-square results for meta summarize and meta forestplot using random empirical Bayes method
Post a Comment