Hi
The meta forestplot using random(ebayes) appears to produce a different value for the I2 result compared to the output for meta summarize using the same method. Using different methods (fixed dlaird etc) produces the same I2 in the meta summarize and forestplot but not when using random(ebayes).
Is the an issue with the meta forestplot?
Thanks
Related Posts with Different I-square results for meta summarize and meta forestplot using random empirical Bayes method
What does xtset do exactly?Hi Statalisters If I set a dataset to a panel dataset using xtset, what exactly is STATA doing? For…
AutocorrelationDear all, I want to estimate an AR. I do so via the following commands: ac pricedifference, lags(6)…
Creating dummy for unique valueHey, For my dataset I have 20+ years of data with 19 unique countries per year I want to create 1 …
Convert all elements of a matrix into respective inverse valuesHi everyone, I am having a problem with converting all elements of a matrix to their respective inv…
How to plot only interaction terms in coefplotI have four regressions and I am trying to plot only the coefficients of the interaction terms, usin…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Different I-square results for meta summarize and meta forestplot using random empirical Bayes method
Post a Comment