Hi
The meta forestplot using random(ebayes) appears to produce a different value for the I2 result compared to the output for meta summarize using the same method. Using different methods (fixed dlaird etc) produces the same I2 in the meta summarize and forestplot but not when using random(ebayes).
Is the an issue with the meta forestplot?
Thanks
Related Posts with Different I-square results for meta summarize and meta forestplot using random empirical Bayes method
heatmap from correlation table (matrix)This is post to share how to make a heatmap based on a correlation matrix (as in picture attached). …
Making a square boxHi all, I have a problem with the image attached. In particular, I do not understand why the scale …
(Struggling with Paramed Mediation)Hey everyone, So Im having a difficulty running paramed mediation package stata. Im receiving the f…
How to display "Fixed effects: heterogeneity across years (stripplot)?"Good morning to the community Stata! I would like to show a graph like the picture showing geometri…
Multiple Comparison of Predictive MarginsDear all Statalists, I am using the following model in Stata 16.1: Code: nbreg y i.x1 i.x2 (other …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Different I-square results for meta summarize and meta forestplot using random empirical Bayes method
Post a Comment