Hi,
I have read in existing literature that if we are dealing with a binary outcome (i.e th individual went for prenatal care/did not go for prenatal care), the Concentration Index is not valid as it is not normalised Could someone please explain how to normalise wagstaff concentration index and what this generally means.
Zahrah
Related Posts with Wagstaff concentration Index for binary outcome
Not obvious behaviorThe following fragment illustrates a rather non-obvious behavior of Stata when working with data fra…
Implied Cost of Equity, mm_root function skips the results of some observationsHi There, I have used the following codes to calculate the implied cost of equity. While the code c…
f test following reghdfe for joint significance of individual fixed effectsHi all, I'd like to run a f-test to test joint significance of each fixed effects. For example, I'd…
MA(5) for panel dataDear Statalist members, I used the information given on this Stata pdf https://www.stata.com/suppor…
Losing Precision with ASEC ID ValuesHi Statalisters, I'm currently working with the 2019 CPS ASEC, trying to match individual responden…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Wagstaff concentration Index for binary outcome
Post a Comment