Hi.
I have a dataset of psychological measures from carers (n=254) of people with mental health patients. We are using regression analyses to explore predictors of experiencing distress in carers.
Some of the carers care for the same patient. In other words - researchers collected the data by asking patients if they could speak to their carers. In most cases, researchers spoke to 1 carer per patient. But they in some cases they recruited more (up to 4) per patient. As such the data are clustered. Approximately 150 patients have 1 carer. Approx. 50 have 2 carers. The remaining 2-3 have 3 or 4 carers. So the clusters are often small.
The data are hierarchical: multiple patients (lower level) per carer (higher level). But in most cases there is only 1 patient per carer.
Does this structure benefit from mixed effects/multi-level modelling or are cluster robust standard errors better?
thank you very much in advance!
Related Posts with multi-level/mixed effects vs clustered robust standard errors - which is more appropriate if many of the clusters have 1 individual?
Seasonality graphicsHi, i need help! I'm testing seasonality in trend research about a rare disease. I found statistic…
Removing label values from selected variablesHi I have applied same label values to various variables. I want to remove such label values from se…
Difference in Difference Approach for Panel datahi I performed a Lab experiment on 34 people (17 in control and 17 in treatment). I played 3 rounds …
Difference-in-difference multiple time periodsDear all For my research, I want to estimate the effect of introducing direct election of mayors in…
Synthetic Controls - String VariablesI am trying to run the npsynth command (Abadie, Diamond, Hainmueller, 2009) with a database of gravi…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to multi-level/mixed effects vs clustered robust standard errors - which is more appropriate if many of the clusters have 1 individual?
Post a Comment