Hi.
I have a dataset of psychological measures from carers (n=254) of people with mental health patients. We are using regression analyses to explore predictors of experiencing distress in carers.
Some of the carers care for the same patient. In other words - researchers collected the data by asking patients if they could speak to their carers. In most cases, researchers spoke to 1 carer per patient. But they in some cases they recruited more (up to 4) per patient. As such the data are clustered. Approximately 150 patients have 1 carer. Approx. 50 have 2 carers. The remaining 2-3 have 3 or 4 carers. So the clusters are often small.
The data are hierarchical: multiple patients (lower level) per carer (higher level). But in most cases there is only 1 patient per carer.
Does this structure benefit from mixed effects/multi-level modelling or are cluster robust standard errors better?
thank you very much in advance!
Related Posts with multi-level/mixed effects vs clustered robust standard errors - which is more appropriate if many of the clusters have 1 individual?
Can the attenuation bias of a demeaned dependent variable be solved by an control function approach?I recently demeaned my dependent variable by a group interaction. Mainly because simply adding them …
R-squared of FE-regressionDear, with the following data: Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install data…
Manipulating local listsIn my code below I expected to get a local macro (myvars2) with a list of all my variables (which ar…
Need help with creating certain variablesHi. EmpCode OfficeCode Year Sept_30 In Out Existing 1 11 2011-12 . . 1 12 2011-12 1 . 1 . …
Creating a new set with every possible pair within a groupDear all, I would like to create a new dataset that includes all possible pairs of observations, wi…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to multi-level/mixed effects vs clustered robust standard errors - which is more appropriate if many of the clusters have 1 individual?
Post a Comment