Hi Statalist,
I would like to estimate a complementary loglog model with induvidual effects using Stata's xtcloglog command.
My dependent variabel is binary with rare events and I have a panel structure with small T and large N, so everything is fine for this kind of model.
I am now struggeling whether to use the pa (population averaged) or re (random effects) option for accounting for individual effects.
The general differences of thes two models are described e.g. here:
https://www.stata.com/support/faqs/s...tion-averaged/
and in more detail here:
http://journals.sfu.ca/llcs/index.ph...ewFile/249/238
The problem ist that I am interested in the marginal effects of a count variable (number of patents applied) on the dependent variable (the probability of bankruptcy of a firm) and that the results are very different for the pa and re model.
The second source I posted says (on page 155-156) that because of the non-llinearity of the assumed distribution the estimated coefficients differ and how they differ. However they also say that standard errors should vary proportionally and thus no serious effects on significant tests are to be expected. But in my case only one model delivers statistical significant results.
I estimate the marginal effects using the margins command at different values of my explanatory variable (say 0, 1 or 5 patents) and the atmeans option for the controls. I suppose no more information about my data is needed to understand the problem but I can offer later.
So beside the effects that it is obviously relevant to select the correct option (re or pa) for the research question, why do the marginal effects for point-estimates and standard errors differ quite substatially?
Thanks and best regards
Tim
Related Posts with xtcloglog population averaged vs. random effects
Gini decomposition by subgroups - ineqdec0Hi everyone, I am estimating the monetary value of in-kind benefits (like education) to be added to …
Event study - sorting groups and assigning estimation windowsHello Statalist! Since my last post didn't get any answers, im trying with the help of the FAQ to c…
Difference in Differences with propensity score matching for repeated cross sectional surveysDear Statalisters! I'm pretty new to Statalist and found a lot of posts regarding DID and PSM, but n…
Saving error messageHi all, I am using a plug-in called traj from https://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/bjones/strtxmpl2.htm.…
Time Fixed Effects using xtregHi, I would like to ask if there's any way to use xtreg to estimate time fixed effects only. I need…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to xtcloglog population averaged vs. random effects
Post a Comment