Here is my code and my results:
Code:
xtset FE_1 FE_2 regress depvar vars i.FE_1 i.FE_2
Cumby-Huizinga test for autocorrelation
Code:
actest, lags(20) Cumby-Huizinga test for autocorrelation H0: variable is MA process up to order q HA: serial correlation present at specified lags >q ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- H0: q=0 (serially uncorrelated) | H0: q=specified lag-1 HA: s.c. present at range specified | HA: s.c. present at lag specified -----------------------------------------+----------------------------------- lags | chi2 df p-val | lag | chi2 df p-val -----------+-----------------------------+-----+----------------------------- 1 - 1 | 757.212 1 0.0000 | 1 | 757.212 1 0.0000 1 - 2 | 1385.812 2 0.0000 | 2 | 695.011 1 0.0000 1 - 3 | 1789.365 3 0.0000 | 3 | 506.361 1 0.0000 1 - 4 | 2273.550 4 0.0000 | 4 | 639.468 1 0.0000 1 - 5 | 2629.892 5 0.0000 | 5 | 546.467 1 0.0000 1 - 6 | 2755.502 6 0.0000 | 6 | 245.182 1 0.0000 1 - 7 | 2842.962 7 0.0000 | 7 | 219.924 1 0.0000 1 - 8 | 2935.920 8 0.0000 | 8 | 222.080 1 0.0000 1 - 9 | 3075.582 9 0.0000 | 9 | 275.906 1 0.0000 1 - 10 | 3157.055 10 0.0000 | 10 | 209.879 1 0.0000 1 - 11 | 3265.898 11 0.0000 | 11 | 233.459 1 0.0000 1 - 12 | 3300.320 12 0.0000 | 12 | 142.085 1 0.0000 1 - 13 | 3343.435 13 0.0000 | 13 | 154.606 1 0.0000 1 - 14 | 3393.600 14 0.0000 | 14 | 156.435 1 0.0000 1 - 15 | 3407.393 15 0.0000 | 15 | 83.492 1 0.0000 1 - 16 | 3468.555 16 0.0000 | 16 | 174.376 1 0.0000 1 - 17 | 3478.740 17 0.0000 | 17 | 67.731 1 0.0000 1 - 18 | 3531.506 18 0.0000 | 18 | 156.942 1 0.0000 1 - 19 | 3619.679 19 0.0000 | 19 | 207.440 1 0.0000 1 - 20 | 3676.357 20 0.0000 | 20 | 171.505 1 0.0000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test allows predetermined regressors/instruments Test requires conditional homoskedasticity
Arellano-Bond test for autocorrelation
Code:
abar, lags(20) Arellano-Bond test for AR(1): z = 27.51 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(2): z = 26.38 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(3): z = 22.57 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(4): z = 25.37 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(5): z = 23.49 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(6): z = 15.74 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(7): z = 14.94 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(8): z = 15.00 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(9): z = 16.72 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(10): z = 14.59 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(11): z = 15.40 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(12): z = 12.04 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(13): z = 12.54 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(14): z = 12.62 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(15): z = 9.22 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(16): z = 13.34 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(17): z = 8.30 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(18): z = 12.65 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(19): z = 14.55 Pr > z = 0.0000 Arellano-Bond test for AR(20): z = 13.23 Pr > z = 0.0000
Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data
Code:
xtserial depvar vars Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data H0: no first-order autocorrelation F( 1, 2765) = 0.000 Prob > F = 0.9980
- Why do the test have very different results?
- What is my mistake?
- What else should I check?
Best regards,
Olaf
0 Response to Why different results for tests for serial correlation / autocorrelation in panel data (abar, actest, xtserial)?
Post a Comment